Roger M, Attali P, Coquelin J P
Service de Gériatrie, Hôpital Charles Richet, Villiers le Bel, France.
Clin Ther. 1993 Jan-Feb;15(1):127-36.
The efficacy and safety of zolpidem, a hypnotic of a new chemical class (the imidazopyridines), was compared with a reference benzodiazepine in elderly insomniac patients in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Hospitalized patients aged 58 to 98 years were randomized to receive zolpidem 5 mg (70 patients), zolpidem 10 mg (74 patients), or triazolam 0.25 mg (77 patients) at bed-time. (Three patients were excluded and 13 patients did not complete the study.) The 3-week active treatment period was preceded by 3 and followed by 7 days of placebo administration. Sleep quality was assessed by the patient via a questionnaire and visual analog scale. A clinician's global impression was also recorded. All measures of sleep quality were improved by both doses of zolpidem and by triazolam. The improvements between the end of the placebo phase and the end of the active treatment phase were significant for all treatments and assessment instruments. Moreover, the significant improvements in all measures were maintained during the week following withdrawal of both doses of zolpidem. The improvement in most sleep assessment parameters was maintained after withdrawal of triazolam. Tolerability of all treatments was excellent. The majority of patients reported no adverse effects. The reported adverse effects in all groups included nightmares, daytime drowsiness, and day- or nighttime agitation. There was no evidence of rebound insomnia; the therapeutic effect of zolpidem outlasted drug treatment. There were no signs of agitation or anxiety following cessation of treatment, which might be indicative of withdrawal phenomena. Confusion was recorded only in the triazolam group. These results suggest that zolpidem is at least as effective as triazolam in geriatric insomniac patients. Zolpidem 5 mg and 10 mg demonstrated a good safety profile. On the basis of these data, zolpidem 5 mg should be given as a starting dose in elderly patients, with a possible increase up to 10 mg in more severe cases of insomnia.
在一项随机、双盲、多中心试验中,将新型化学类别催眠药(咪唑吡啶类)唑吡坦与一种对照苯二氮䓬类药物在老年失眠患者中的疗效和安全性进行了比较。58至98岁的住院患者被随机分配在睡前服用唑吡坦5毫克(70例患者)、唑吡坦10毫克(74例患者)或三唑仑0.25毫克(77例患者)。(3例患者被排除,13例患者未完成研究。)在为期3周的积极治疗期之前和之后分别有3天和7天给予安慰剂。睡眠质量由患者通过问卷和视觉模拟量表进行评估。还记录了临床医生的总体印象。两种剂量的唑吡坦和三唑仑均改善了所有睡眠质量指标。对于所有治疗和评估工具,安慰剂阶段结束至积极治疗阶段结束之间的改善均具有显著性。此外,在停用两种剂量的唑吡坦后的一周内,所有指标的显著改善均得以维持。停用三唑仑后,大多数睡眠评估参数的改善仍得以维持。所有治疗的耐受性都很好。大多数患者报告无不良反应。所有组报告的不良反应包括噩梦、日间嗜睡以及日间或夜间激越。没有反弹性失眠的证据;唑吡坦的治疗效果持续时间超过药物治疗。停药后没有激越或焦虑的迹象,这可能表明存在撤药现象。仅在三唑仑组记录到了意识模糊。这些结果表明,唑吡坦在老年失眠患者中至少与三唑仑一样有效。唑吡坦5毫克和10毫克显示出良好的安全性。基于这些数据,唑吡坦5毫克应作为老年患者的起始剂量,在失眠更严重的情况下可能增加至10毫克。