Kiyohashi A, Kurihara M, Yoshida S, Ohkubo T, Suga S
First Department of Internal Medicine, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1993 Feb;23(1):41-5.
The "Criteria for Evaluating the Efficacy of Chemotherapy/Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer" are now widely used in Japan. To assess the validity of the criteria, the relation between the antitumor effect evaluated by the criteria and the survival of patients with gastric cancer was analyzed. The subjects were 169 patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer who were entered into a randomized comparative trial of tegafur plus mitomycin C, or UFT (a combination of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio) plus mitomycin C. Irrespective of their performance status, disease extent and chemotherapy regimen, responding patients showed improved survival over non-responding patients. If the primary gastric lesion responded to chemotherapy, prolongation of survival was noted in patients with a measurable gastric lesion as well as in those with a non-measurable but evaluable gastric lesion. No improvement in survival was recognized among patients having a primary gastric lesion which did not respond to chemotherapy, even if the metastases showed a response. The results obtained in the present study indicate the validity of the criteria, except for diffusely infiltrating gastric lesions.
《胃癌化疗/放疗疗效评估标准》目前在日本被广泛应用。为评估该标准的有效性,分析了依据此标准评估的抗肿瘤效果与胃癌患者生存率之间的关系。研究对象为169例不可切除的晚期胃癌患者,他们被纳入替加氟加丝裂霉素C或优福定(尿嘧啶与替加氟按4:1摩尔比组成的复方制剂)加丝裂霉素C的随机对照试验。无论患者的体能状态、疾病范围及化疗方案如何,有反应的患者比无反应的患者生存期更长。如果原发性胃病变对化疗有反应,可测量胃病变患者以及不可测量但可评估胃病变患者的生存期均有延长。即使转移灶有反应,原发性胃病变对化疗无反应的患者生存期也未见改善。本研究结果表明,除弥漫浸润性胃病变外,该标准是有效的。