Soliman S R, Burrows R F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
CMAJ. 1993 Apr 15;148(8):1315-20.
To examine the effect of recommendations to reduce the cesarean section rate issued by the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth in 1986 on obstetric practices and to identify current patient factors that predict cesarean section.
Descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study.
A tertiary care perinatal referral centre and a general teaching hospital with a level 2 nursery in Hamilton, Ont.
All patients who gave birth at the two hospitals in 1982 (4121 women) and 1990 (4431).
Cesarean section rates and indications and predictors of cesarean section.
Although a trial of vaginal delivery after cesarean section was offered 93% more often in 1990 than in 1982 (p = 0.0002), the rate of vaginal delivery increased only 2.6%, for a reduction of 8.7% in the total cesarean section rate and of 15% in the repeat cesarean section rate. The incidence rate and treatment of dystocia did not change. The rate of cesarean section for breech presentation remained unchanged, and fetal distress was rarely confirmed with pH measurement in scalp blood before cesarean section. The most important predictors of cesarean section in 1990 were previous cesarean section and labour induction. For the nulliparous women and the multiparous women with no previous cesarean section labour induction was the most important predictor.
The rate at which patients with previous cesarean section are offered a trial of vaginal delivery has increased significantly since 1982; however, the total and repeat cesarean section rates have not decreased proportionally. Induction of labour is currently the most important correctable predictor of cesarean section. The active management of dystocia, efforts to increase the rate of vaginal breech delivery and appropriate methods to diagnose fetal distress need to be improved; such improvements should reduce the cesarean section rate further.
探讨1986年全国剖宫产相关问题共识会议发布的降低剖宫产率的建议对产科实践的影响,并确定当前预测剖宫产的患者因素。
描述性回顾性横断面研究。
安大略省汉密尔顿市的一家三级围产期转诊中心和一家设有二级新生儿重症监护室的综合教学医院。
1982年(4121名女性)和1990年(4431名女性)在这两家医院分娩的所有患者。
剖宫产率、剖宫产指征及剖宫产的预测因素。
尽管1990年剖宫产术后试产的提供率比1982年高出93%(p = 0.0002),但阴道分娩率仅增加了2.6%,总剖宫产率降低了8.7%,再次剖宫产率降低了15%。难产的发生率及处理方式未发生变化。臀位剖宫产率保持不变,剖宫产术前很少通过头皮血pH值测定来确诊胎儿窘迫。1990年剖宫产的最重要预测因素是既往剖宫产史和引产。对于未产妇和无既往剖宫产史的经产妇,引产是最重要的预测因素。
自1982年以来,有既往剖宫产史的患者接受阴道试产的比例显著增加;然而,总剖宫产率和再次剖宫产率并未成比例下降。引产目前是剖宫产最重要的可纠正预测因素。难产的积极处理、提高阴道臀位分娩率的努力以及诊断胎儿窘迫的适当方法都需要改进;这些改进应能进一步降低剖宫产率。