Murasugi C M, Salzman C D, Newsome W T
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-3501.
J Neurosci. 1993 Apr;13(4):1719-29. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-04-01719.1993.
We have previously shown that perceptual judgements of motion direction are based in part on the activity of direction selective neurons in extrastriate visual area MT (Salzman et al., 1990, 1992). In those experiments, we applied low-amplitude microstimulation pulses (10 microA, 200 Hz) to clusters of MT neurons whose preferred directions were similar. The effect of microstimulation was to bias the monkeys' choices on a direction discrimination task toward the preferred direction of neurons at the stimulation site. The results suggest that microstimulation generated a directionally specific cortical signal by activating selectively neurons near the electrode tip. To test this notion more directly, we have now examined the behavioral effects of varying current amplitude, current frequency, and electrode position. In the majority of experiments, the directional bias in the monkeys' choices was reduced or eliminated as current amplitude increased to 80 microA. In addition, 80 microA stimulating pulses frequently impaired overall performance as measured by the percentage of correct responses. This decrement in performance indicated that 80 microA pulses introduced "noise" into the neural circuitry encoding motion direction, presumably by increasing current spread to activate a larger population of neurons representing all directions of motion. In contrast, increasing current frequency to 500 Hz (10 microA pulses) preserved the directional specificity of microstimulation effects. The precise position of the stimulating electrode also influenced the magnitude of microstimulation effects; in some cases, differences in position on the order of 100 microns determined whether an experiment yielded a very large effect or no effect at all. Thus, directionally specific activation of cortical circuitry within MT can be disrupted by increases in current spread or by small changes in electrode position. These observations suggest that the effects of low-amplitude microstimulation depend upon direct activation of a well-localized population of neurons.
我们之前已经表明,对运动方向的感知判断部分基于纹外视觉区域MT中方向选择性神经元的活动(萨尔兹曼等人,1990年,1992年)。在那些实验中,我们对首选方向相似的MT神经元簇施加低幅度微刺激脉冲(10微安,200赫兹)。微刺激的效果是使猴子在方向辨别任务中的选择偏向于刺激部位神经元的首选方向。结果表明,微刺激通过选择性激活电极尖端附近的神经元产生了方向特异性的皮质信号。为了更直接地测试这一概念,我们现在研究了改变电流幅度、电流频率和电极位置的行为效应。在大多数实验中,随着电流幅度增加到80微安,猴子选择中的方向偏差减小或消除。此外,80微安的刺激脉冲经常会损害以正确反应百分比衡量的整体表现。表现的下降表明,80微安的脉冲将“噪声”引入了编码运动方向的神经回路中,大概是通过增加电流扩散来激活代表所有运动方向的更大数量的神经元。相比之下,将电流频率增加到500赫兹(10微安脉冲)保留了微刺激效应的方向特异性。刺激电极的精确位置也影响微刺激效应的大小;在某些情况下,100微米量级的位置差异决定了实验是否会产生非常大的效果或根本没有效果。因此,MT内皮质回路的方向特异性激活可被电流扩散的增加或电极位置的微小变化所破坏。这些观察结果表明,低幅度微刺激的效果取决于对一组定位良好的神经元的直接激活。