• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿替洛尔用于短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性缺血性卒中后二级预防的试验。荷兰短暂性脑缺血发作试验研究组。

Trial of secondary prevention with atenolol after transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group.

出版信息

Stroke. 1993 Apr;24(4):543-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.4.543.

DOI:10.1161/01.str.24.4.543
PMID:8465360
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

beta-Blockers prevent vascular events in patients after myocardial infarction and lower blood pressure, the main risk factor for stroke. Hence, we assessed the effects of atenolol on the occurrence of death from vascular causes, stroke, or myocardial infarction and on blood pressure in patients after a transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial we studied the occurrence of the outcome event death from vascular causes, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction and the outcome event fatal or nonfatal stroke as well as blood pressure on follow-up. A total of 1,473 aspirin-treated patients with transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke were randomized to 50 mg atenolol daily or placebo. The mean follow-up was 2.6 years.

RESULTS

Patients on atenolol had a risk of 97/732 (13.3%) for the combined outcome event versus a risk of 95/741 (12.8%) for those on placebo (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.33). The adjusted hazard ratio for fatal or nonfatal stroke was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.19). More patients on beta-blocker (153) reported adverse effects than on placebo (103). At the first follow-up visit after randomization (median at 4 months) systolic blood pressure in the atenolol group had dropped by 8.0 mm Hg compared with 2.2 mm Hg in the placebo group (difference, 5.8 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-8.6 mm Hg). For diastolic blood pressure this difference was 2.9 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.4 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data neither confirm nor rule out that atenolol prevents important vascular events in patients after transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke, given the modest effect on blood pressure, the restrictions in patient selection, and the limited number of patient-years.

摘要

背景与目的

β受体阻滞剂可预防心肌梗死后患者发生血管事件,并降低血压,而血压是中风的主要危险因素。因此,我们评估了阿替洛尔对短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性缺血性中风患者血管性死亡、中风或心肌梗死发生率以及血压的影响。

方法

在一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验中,我们研究了随访时血管性死亡、非致命性中风或非致命性心肌梗死等结局事件的发生情况,以及致命或非致命性中风这一结局事件和血压情况。共有1473例接受阿司匹林治疗的短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性缺血性中风患者被随机分为每日服用50毫克阿替洛尔组或安慰剂组。平均随访时间为2.6年。

结果

服用阿替洛尔的患者发生联合结局事件的风险为97/732(13.3%),而服用安慰剂的患者为95/741(12.8%)(调整后风险比为1.00;95%置信区间为0.76 - 1.33)。致命或非致命性中风的调整后风险比为0.82(95%置信区间为0.57 - 1.19)。报告有不良反应的β受体阻滞剂组患者(153例)多于安慰剂组(103例)。随机分组后的首次随访(中位数为4个月)时,阿替洛尔组的收缩压下降了8.0毫米汞柱,而安慰剂组下降了2.2毫米汞柱(差值为5.8毫米汞柱;95%置信区间为2.9 - 8.6毫米汞柱)。舒张压的差值为2.9毫米汞柱(95%置信区间为1.5 - 4.4毫米汞柱)。

结论

鉴于阿替洛尔对血压的影响不大、患者选择存在限制以及患者人年数有限,我们的数据既未证实也未排除阿替洛尔可预防短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性缺血性中风患者发生重要血管事件。

相似文献

1
Trial of secondary prevention with atenolol after transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group.阿替洛尔用于短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性缺血性卒中后二级预防的试验。荷兰短暂性脑缺血发作试验研究组。
Stroke. 1993 Apr;24(4):543-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.4.543.
2
We need stronger predictors of major vascular events in patients with a recent transient ischemic attack or nondisabling stroke. Dutch TIA Trial Study Group.我们需要更强有力的指标来预测近期发生短暂性脑缺血发作或非致残性卒中患者的主要血管事件。荷兰短暂性脑缺血发作试验研究组。
Stroke. 1997 Apr;28(4):774-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.4.774.
3
The Dutch TIA trial: protective effects of low-dose aspirin and atenolol in patients with transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling stroke. The Dutch TIA Study Group.
Stroke. 1988 Apr;19(4):512-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.4.512.
4
Risk of cardiac events in atypical transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. The Dutch TIA Study Group.非典型短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度卒中后心脏事件的风险。荷兰短暂性脑缺血发作研究组
Lancet. 1992 Sep 12;340(8820):630-3. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92170-k.
5
A comparison of two doses of aspirin (30 mg vs. 283 mg a day) in patients after a transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke.对短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度缺血性卒中患者使用两种剂量阿司匹林(每日30毫克与283毫克)的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 31;325(18):1261-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110313251801.
6
Predictors of major vascular events in patients with a transient ischemic attack or nondisabling stroke. The Dutch TIA Trial Study Group.
Stroke. 1993 Apr;24(4):527-31. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.4.527.
7
Long term risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death in "low risk" patients with a non-recent transient ischaemic attack.近期无短暂性脑缺血发作的“低风险”患者发生中风、心肌梗死和血管性死亡的长期风险
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 May;74(5):577-80. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.5.577.
8
Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial.心血管终点维拉帕米控制起效研究(CONVINCE)试验的主要结果。
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2073-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.16.2073.
9
Dipyridamole for preventing stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease.双嘧达莫用于预防血管疾病患者的中风及其他血管事件。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD001820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001820.
10
Verapamil-sustained release-based treatment strategy is equivalent to atenolol-based treatment strategy at reducing cardiovascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction: an INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril (INVEST) substudy.在降低既往心肌梗死患者心血管事件方面,基于维拉帕米缓释片的治疗策略等同于基于阿替洛尔的治疗策略:一项国际维拉帕米缓释片-群多普利(INVEST)子研究。
Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.02.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同类别降压药物预防卒中的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0313309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309. eCollection 2025.
2
Antihypertensive strategies for the prevention of secondary stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预防继发性中风的降压策略:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jan 9;30(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02226-3.
3
European stroke organisation (ESO) guideline on cerebral small vessel disease, part 2, lacunar ischaemic stroke.
欧洲卒中组织(ESO)脑小血管病指南,第 2 部分,腔隙性缺血性卒中。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Mar;9(1):5-68. doi: 10.1177/23969873231219416. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
4
Randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive therapy: does exclusion of orthostatic hypotension alter treatment effect? A systematic review and meta-analysis.随机对照降压治疗试验:排除直立性低血压是否改变治疗效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2023 Apr 1;52(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad044.
5
Association Between Magnitude of Differential Blood Pressure Reduction and Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Meta-analysis and Meta-Regression.降压幅度与二级卒中预防的关系:Meta 分析与 Meta 回归。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 May 1;80(5):506-515. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0218.
6
Secondary Ischemic Stroke Prevention.二级预防缺血性脑卒中。
Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Apr;20(3):721-731. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01352-w. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
7
Benefits and risks of antihypertensive medication in adults with different systolic blood pressure: A meta-analysis from the perspective of the number needed to treat.不同收缩压水平的成年患者使用抗高血压药物的获益与风险:基于治疗所需人数视角的荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 19;9:986502. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.986502. eCollection 2022.
8
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on pharmacological interventions for long-term secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)关于缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作后长期二级预防的药物干预指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2022 Sep;7(3):I-II. doi: 10.1177/23969873221100032. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Is Blood Pressure Lowering in the Very Elderly With Previous Stroke Associated With a Higher Risk of Adverse Events?非常高龄且既往有卒中史患者的降压治疗与不良事件风险增加相关吗?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e022240. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022240. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
10
Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis.降压治疗与不良事件的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 10;372:n189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n189.