Suppr超能文献

最大自主通气量。慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和正常受试者的肺量计测定指标

Maximum voluntary ventilation. Spirometric determinants in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and normal subjects.

作者信息

Dillard T A, Hnatiuk O W, McCumber T R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20307-5001.

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Apr;147(4):870-5. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.870.

Abstract

The 12-s maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) provides an estimate of the ventilatory reserves available to meet the physiologic demands of exercise. Earlier studies established a general relationship between MVV and FEV1. We hypothesized that the resting maximum inspiratory flow rate (MIFR) also serves as a clinically useful predictor of the MVV. A total of 105 subjects, 45 women and 60 men (age 57 +/- 5 yr, mean +/- SD), with expiratory impairment categories of severe (n = 26), moderate (n = 22), mild (n = 18), and normal (n = 39) based on FEV1 (percentage of predicted), comprised the study samples. The ratio MVV/FEV1 averaged 41 +/- 7 overall. The FEV1 correlated with MVV in normal subjects (p < 0.05, r2 = 0.642) and patients (p < 0.05, r2 = 0.787) better than MIFR (p < 0.05, r2 > or = 0.480). MIFR joined with FEV1 in multiple linear regression to significantly improve the description of MVV:MVV L/min = 30.77FEV1 (L) + 5.94MIFR (L/s) - 4.77 (n = 105; p < 0.05, r2 = 0.849). The 95% confidence limits for MVV varied from 90 to 110% of predicted from the equation for this sample. The factors sex and impairment category did not reduce the unexplained variability in MVV after inclusion of FEV1 and MIFR as covariates in ANOVA (p > 0.05). Addition of MIFR to the model with FEV1 produced greater improvement in r2 than PImax. We conclude that MIFR, although secondary in importance to FEV1, is a significant determinant of MVV in patients with COPD and normal subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

12秒最大自主通气量(MVV)可评估满足运动生理需求的通气储备情况。早期研究确立了MVV与第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)之间的一般关系。我们假设静息时最大吸气流量率(MIFR)也是MVV的一个临床有用预测指标。基于FEV1(预测值百分比),共有105名受试者,45名女性和60名男性(年龄57±5岁,均值±标准差),呼气功能障碍类别为重度(n = 26)、中度(n = 22)、轻度(n = 18)和正常(n = 39),构成了研究样本。总体上MVV/FEV1比值平均为41±7。在正常受试者(p < 0.05,r2 = 0.642)和患者(p < 0.05,r2 = 0.787)中,FEV1与MVV的相关性优于MIFR(p < 0.05,r2≥0.480)。MIFR与FEV1纳入多元线性回归可显著改善对MVV的描述:MVV(L/min)= 30.77FEV1(L)+ 5.94MIFR(L/s) - 4.77(n = 105;p < 0.05,r2 = 0.849)。该样本方程预测的MVV的95%置信区间为预测值的90%至110%。在方差分析中,将FEV1和MIFR作为协变量纳入后,性别和功能障碍类别因素并未减少MVV中无法解释的变异性(p > 0.05)。在包含FEV1的模型中加入MIFR比加入最大吸气压力(PImax)能使r2有更大改善。我们得出结论,MIFR虽然在重要性上仅次于FEV1,但在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者和正常受试者中是MVV的一个重要决定因素。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验