Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)焦虑症类别的可靠性。使用修订后的焦虑症访谈量表(ADIS-R)。

Reliability of DSM-III-R anxiety disorder categories. Using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Revised (ADIS-R).

作者信息

Di Nardo P, Moras K, Barlow D H, Rapee R M, Brown T A

机构信息

State University of New York, College, Oneonta.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;50(4):251-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820160009001.

Abstract

A large reliability study of DSM-III-R anxiety disorders is reported in which outpatients (n = 267) received two independent structured interviews (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Revised). It is the only reliability study to date in which the final DSM-III-R criteria are used throughout the study. Reliability was assessed for each diagnosis when it was assigned as a principal diagnosis and when it was assigned as either a principal or an additional diagnosis. Excellent reliability was obtained for current principal diagnoses of simple phobia, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Agreement was good for panic disorder when all severity levels of agoraphobic avoidance were combined. Reliability was fair for generalized anxiety disorder. Remaining diagnostic difficulties, particularly in identifying levels of agoraphobic avoidance and in reliably diagnosing generalized anxiety disorder, are discussed in the context of changes in diagnostic criteria that are under consideration for DSM-IV.

摘要

本文报告了一项关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》(DSM-III-R)焦虑症的大型信度研究。该研究中,门诊患者(n = 267)接受了两次独立的结构化访谈(修订版焦虑症访谈量表)。这是迄今为止唯一一项在整个研究过程中都采用最终DSM-III-R标准的信度研究。当每种诊断被指定为主要诊断以及当它被指定为主要诊断或附加诊断时,都会对其信度进行评估。对于当前主要诊断的单纯恐惧症、社交恐惧症和强迫症,获得了极佳的信度。当广场恐怖症回避的所有严重程度合并在一起时,惊恐障碍的一致性良好。广泛性焦虑症的信度一般。在考虑《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)诊断标准变化的背景下,讨论了剩余的诊断困难,特别是在确定广场恐怖症回避程度以及可靠诊断广泛性焦虑症方面的困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验