Suppr超能文献

焦虑评估的可靠性。I. 诊断一致性。

Reliability of anxiety assessment. I. Diagnostic agreement.

作者信息

Mannuzza S, Fyer A J, Martin L Y, Gallops M S, Endicott J, Gorman J, Liebowitz M R, Klein D F

机构信息

Anxiety Disorders Clinic, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Dec;46(12):1093-101. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810120035007.

Abstract

Test-retest reliability of lifetime anxiety disorder diagnoses was determined using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Anxiety version. The subjects were 104 patients at an anxiety research clinic. Reliability ranged from good to excellent (kappa = +.60 to +.90) for generalized anxiety, social phobic, panic, agoraphobic, and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Simple phobia showed poor agreement. Current episodes showed better agreement than past episodes, particularly for social phobia and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Major sources of disagreement (variance in subject report, rate error, criterion ambiguity) were reviewed for each diagnosis and implications for DSM-IV are proposed.

摘要

使用《情感障碍与精神分裂症问卷 - 终生焦虑版》确定终生焦虑症诊断的重测信度。研究对象为一家焦虑症研究诊所的104名患者。广泛性焦虑症、社交恐惧症、惊恐障碍、广场恐惧症和强迫症的信度从良好到优秀(kappa系数为 +.60至 +.90)。单纯恐惧症的一致性较差。当前发作的一致性优于过去发作,尤其是社交恐惧症和强迫症。针对每种诊断审查了不一致的主要来源(受试者报告的差异、率误差、标准模糊性),并提出了对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验