Suppr超能文献

荧光偏振免疫分析法(FPIA)与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定人血浆中氟卡尼的方法比较。

Comparison of fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for the measurement of flecainide in human plasma.

作者信息

Hoppe U, Krüdewagen B, Stein H, Hertrampf R, Gundert-Remy U

机构信息

Institut für Arzneimittel des Bundesgesundheitsamtes, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):142-7.

PMID:8468112
Abstract

The precision and accuracy of HPLC and FPIA for the measurement of flecainide plasma levels were compared below, in and above the therapeutic range (200-1,000 ng/ml). Following a calibration crossover study, five standard plasma solutions of varying flecainide concentrations (SPS) and 99 flecainide containing plasma samples of 24 in-patients (IPS) were analyzed with both methods. The results show that within the range of approximately 500-1,500 ng/ml, the two methods did not differ in either precision (expressed as coefficient of variation, CV) or accuracy (expressed as relative error, RE). Close to the lower limit and below the therapeutic range however, HPLC provided greater precision and accuracy than FPIA.

摘要

下面比较了高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和荧光偏振免疫分析法(FPIA)在治疗范围(200 - 1000 ng/ml)以下、范围内及以上测定氟卡尼血浆水平时的精密度和准确性。在校准交叉研究之后,用这两种方法分析了五种不同氟卡尼浓度的标准血浆溶液(SPS)以及99份来自24名住院患者的含氟卡尼血浆样本(IPS)。结果表明,在大约500 - 1500 ng/ml范围内,两种方法在精密度(以变异系数,CV表示)或准确性(以相对误差,RE表示)方面均无差异。然而,在接近下限且低于治疗范围时,HPLC比FPIA具有更高的精密度和准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验