Faught E, Sachdeo R C, Remler M P, Chayasirisobhon S, Iragui-Madoz V J, Ramsay R E, Sutula T P, Kanner A, Harner R N, Kuzniecky R
Department of Neurology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham.
Neurology. 1993 Apr;43(4):688-92. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.4.688.
We evaluated felbamate (FBM) monotherapy in 111 patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial. During the 56-day baseline period, patients had at least eight partial-onset seizures and received one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) at a therapeutic level; a second AED was allowed if at a subtherapeutic level. Patients received either FBM 3,600 mg/d or valproate (VPA) 15 mg/kg/d. The baseline AED at therapeutic levels was discontinued by one-third decrements on study days 1, 14, and 28 and the sub-therapeutic AED, if any, was discontinued completely on study day 1. Study endpoints were completion of 112 study days or fulfilling one or more escape criteria. Criteria for escape relative to baseline were (1) twofold increase in monthly seizure frequency, (2) twofold increase in highest 2-day seizure frequency, (3) single generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTC) if none occurred during baseline, or (4) significant prolongation of GTCs. The primary efficacy variable was the number of patients in each treatment group who met escape criteria. Thirty-seven patients on VPA and 18 on FBM met escape criteria (p < 0.001). Even when we considered FBM dropouts to have fulfilled escape criteria and VPA dropouts to have completed the 112-day trial, the treatment difference remained statistically significant (p = 0.039) in favor of FBM. Adverse experiences with FBM were all mild or moderate in severity. The frequency of adverse experiences was much lower during monotherapy. FBM monotherapy was effective in the treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.
在一项多中心、双盲、平行组试验中,我们评估了非氨酯(FBM)单药治疗111例部分性发作未得到控制的患者的疗效。在为期56天的基线期内,患者至少有8次部分性发作,且接受一种处于治疗水平的标准抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗;若另一种AED处于亚治疗水平,则允许使用。患者分别接受3600mg/d的FBM或15mg/kg/d的丙戊酸盐(VPA)治疗。处于治疗水平的基线AED在研究第1天、第14天和第28天以每次减少三分之一的剂量停用,而亚治疗水平的AED(若有)在研究第1天完全停用。研究终点为完成112天的研究或满足一项或多项退出标准。相对于基线的退出标准为:(1)每月发作频率增加两倍;(2)最高连续2天发作频率增加两倍;(3)若基线期未发生,则出现单次全面强直阵挛发作(GTC);或(4)GTC明显延长。主要疗效变量为各治疗组中达到退出标准的患者数量。接受VPA治疗的37例患者和接受FBM治疗的18例患者达到退出标准(p<0.001)。即使我们将FBM治疗中断的患者视为已达到退出标准,将VPA治疗中断的患者视为已完成112天试验,治疗差异仍具有统计学意义(p = 0.039),支持FBM治疗。FBM的不良事件均为轻度或中度。单药治疗期间不良事件的发生率要低得多。FBM单药治疗对伴或不伴继发全面性发作的部分性发作有效,且安全性良好。