家用尿促黄体生成素免疫测定法在确定性交后试验时间方面的效用。
The utility of a home urinary LH immunoassay in timing the postcoital test.
作者信息
Corsan G H, Blotner M B, Bohrer M K, Shelden R, Kemmann E
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick.
出版信息
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;81(5 ( Pt 1)):736-8.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether a urinary LH immunoassay improves timing of the postcoital test compared to traditional timing methods in normally ovulating women.
METHODS
Subjects included 37 infertile couples evaluated in a tertiary care setting. A randomized, prospective trial was performed of two methods of postcoital test timing: urinary LH assay or the traditional timing by cycle-averaging and/or review of basal body temperature graphs.
RESULTS
Similar serum estradiol, progesterone, LH, number of motile sperm per high-power field, cervical mucus scores, and postcoital test scores were identified in both groups.
CONCLUSION
Urinary LH immunoassays do not appear to improve timing of the postcoital test as compared with traditional timing methods.
目的
评估与传统计时方法相比，尿促黄体生成素免疫测定法是否能改善正常排卵女性性交后试验的计时。
方法
研究对象包括在三级医疗中心接受评估的37对不孕夫妇。对性交后试验计时的两种方法进行了一项随机、前瞻性试验：尿促黄体生成素测定法或通过周期平均和/或基础体温图回顾的传统计时法。
结果
两组的血清雌二醇、孕酮、促黄体生成素、每高倍视野活动精子数、宫颈黏液评分和性交后试验评分相似。
结论
与传统计时方法相比，尿促黄体生成素免疫测定法似乎并不能改善性交后试验的计时。
Zotero 插件