Fennerty M B, Davidson J, Emerson S S, Sampliner R E, Hixson L J, Garewal H S
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Apr;88(4):496-500.
Many clinical studies of colorectal adenomatous polyps rely on endoscopic estimation of polyp size. To examine the reliability of such measurements, we conducted a study using artificial polyps in an endoscopy teaching model. Eight experienced endoscopists estimated the size of 13 polyps in two separate sessions 2 wk apart. Endoscopic estimates of polyp size tended to be significantly lower than the true polyp size for all polyps and all endoscopists at both sessions. We also found a statistically significant difference in the magnitude of the underestimation between the first and second session (p < 0.0001). At the first session, polyps tended to be estimated at 64% of their true size, and at the second session, the estimates tended to be at 77% of the actual polyp size. We estimate the magnitude of the variation in polyp measurements due to individual polyps, endoscopist, and examination session, and discuss the impact these sources of variation have in planning of clinical trials.
许多关于结直肠腺瘤性息肉的临床研究依赖于对息肉大小的内镜估计。为了检验此类测量的可靠性,我们在内镜教学模型中使用人工息肉进行了一项研究。八位经验丰富的内镜医师在相隔两周的两个不同时段对13个息肉的大小进行了估计。在两个时段中,对于所有息肉和所有内镜医师而言,内镜对息肉大小的估计往往显著低于息肉的真实大小。我们还发现,第一次和第二次测量时低估幅度存在统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.0001)。在第一次测量时,息肉大小的估计值往往为其真实大小的64%,而在第二次测量时,估计值往往为息肉实际大小的77%。我们估计了因个体息肉、内镜医师和检查时段导致的息肉测量值变化幅度,并讨论了这些变化来源在临床试验规划中的影响。