Suppr超能文献

果汁和甜味剂碳稳定同位素比率分析中的样品制备偏差

Sample preparation bias in carbon stable isotope ratio analysis of fruit juices and sweeteners.

作者信息

Krueger D A

机构信息

Krueger Food Laboratories, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 1993 Mar-Apr;76(2):418-20.

PMID:8471867
Abstract

Two sample preparation methods are commonly used for carbon stable isotope ratio analysis (SIRA). One involves combustion of the sample with oxygen at 850 degrees C; the other involves combustion of the sample with CuO in an evacuated glass tube at 550 degrees C. I observed in our laboratory that these 2 methods yield different results for sugar-based products such as fruit juices, sweeteners, and vanillin. The CuO method yields results approximately 1%. more positive than the oxygen combustion method. This bias is also observed in other laboratories, as shown in an analysis of the results of the AOAC collaborative studies of carbon SIRA of maple syrup, orange juice, honey, and honey protein. The oxygen combustion method is the AOAC method for honey, apple juice, and orange juice; both methods are incorporated into the AOAC method for maple syrup. I recommend that data generated by the CuO combustion method be appropriately corrected to yield results concordant with the official oxygen combustion method.

摘要

碳稳定同位素比率分析(SIRA)通常采用两种样品制备方法。一种是在850摄氏度下用氧气燃烧样品;另一种是在550摄氏度的真空玻璃管中用氧化铜燃烧样品。我在我们实验室观察到,对于果汁、甜味剂和香草醛等糖基产品,这两种方法会产生不同的结果。氧化铜法得到的结果比氧气燃烧法大约正1%。其他实验室也观察到了这种偏差,如对枫糖浆、橙汁、蜂蜜和蜂蜜蛋白的碳SIRA的AOAC协作研究结果分析所示。氧气燃烧法是AOAC用于蜂蜜、苹果汁和橙汁的方法;两种方法都被纳入AOAC用于枫糖浆的方法中。我建议对氧化铜燃烧法产生的数据进行适当校正,以得到与官方氧气燃烧法一致的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验