Judge K, Benzeval M
King's Fund Institute, London.
BMJ. 1993 Mar 13;306(6879):677-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6879.677.
To show that the exclusion from conventional class based analyses of child mortality of children whose parents are classified as "unoccupied" produces a misleading picture of health inequalities.
Reanalysis of data published in the childhood supplement of the registrar general's decennial supplement on occupational mortality in England and Wales, which compares numerator data for registrations of deaths in children over the age of 1 but below their 16th birthday in 1979, 1980, 1982, and 1983 with data about children aged 1-15 who were enumerated at the 1981 census.
Parents who are classified as "unoccupied" largely consist of economically inactive single mothers. Their children are estimated to represent 89% of the 614,000 aged 1-15 classified as "unoccupied" in the childhood supplement. They have the worst mortality record of all social groups--an age specific death rate of 68.8/100,000 a year, 42% worse than in social class V (48.4/100,000) and worse than that of social class I (22.8) by a factor of 3. At older ages (10-15 years) these children have a relative risk of death of 4.14 relative to classes I and II; the risk is 2.58 in children 0-4 and 2.56 in those 5-9. Relative risks of child mortality in social classes I and II in comparison to classes IV and V suggests a progressive shallowing from 2.08 at ages 1-4 to 1.37 at ages 10-15. When unoccupied parents were combined with classes IV and V and compared with classes I and II, however, inequalities seemed to be pervasive throughout childhood; the relative risks were 2.21 for those aged 1-4 and 1.98 for those aged 10-15.
Children classified as unoccupied are almost certainly living in poverty as well as experiencing relatively high risks of mortality. Class based analyses which exclude them therefore produce a misleading picture of inequalities in child health. The implications for health policy are profound. Strategies to promote the nation's health should acknowledge the importance of material and social deprivation more explicitly.
证明在基于传统阶层的儿童死亡率分析中,将父母被归类为“无业”的儿童排除在外会产生关于健康不平等的误导性图景。
对英格兰和威尔士职业死亡率登记总长十年期增刊儿童增刊中公布的数据进行重新分析,该分析将1979年、1980年、1982年和1983年1岁以上但未满16岁儿童死亡登记的分子数据与1981年人口普查中统计的1 - 15岁儿童数据进行比较。
被归类为“无业”的父母主要是经济不活跃的单身母亲。据估计,她们的孩子占儿童增刊中被归类为“无业”的61.4万名1 - 15岁儿童的89%。他们拥有所有社会群体中最差的死亡率记录——年龄别死亡率为每年68.8/10万,比社会阶层V(48.4/10万)差42%,比社会阶层I(22.8/10万)差3倍。在较大年龄(10 - 15岁)时,相对于社会阶层I和II,这些儿童的相对死亡风险为4.14;在0 - 4岁儿童中风险为2.58,在5 - 9岁儿童中风险为2.56。与社会阶层IV和V相比,社会阶层I和II中儿童死亡率的相对风险显示出从1 - 4岁时的2.08逐渐降至10 - 15岁时的1.37。然而,当将无业父母与社会阶层IV和V合并并与社会阶层I和II进行比较时,不平等现象在整个儿童期似乎普遍存在;1 - 4岁儿童的相对风险为2.21,10 - 15岁儿童的相对风险为1.98。
被归类为无业的儿童几乎肯定生活在贫困中,并且面临相对较高的死亡风险。因此,排除这些儿童的基于阶层的分析会产生关于儿童健康不平等的误导性图景。这对卫生政策具有深远影响。促进国民健康的策略应更明确地承认物质和社会剥夺的重要性。