De Rossi G, Grossi C, Foà R, Tabilio A, Vègna L, Lo Coco F, Annino L, Camera A, Cascavilla N, Ciolli S
Dipartimento di Biopatologia Umana, Universita La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.
Leuk Lymphoma. 1993 Feb;9(3):221-8. doi: 10.3109/10428199309147374.
The immunophenotype of 304 adult lymphoblastic leukemias (> 18 years) diagnosed on the basis of the FAB criteria was determined at the time of diagnosis using a panel of monoclonal antibodies. The series comprised cases diagnosed and immunophenotyped in 43 Italian centers (GIMEMA Cooperative Group) between April 1988 and June 1991. The immunophenotypic characterization consisted of two consecutive steps. The initial screening was based on the reactivity for TdT, HLA-Dr, CD7, CD10, CD13, CD19, CD24, CD33 and CD41. According to the results obtained, the second level of investigation assessed the positivity for intra cytoplasmic (Cy) Ig, CD1a, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8 and CD20. Based on the hierarchical expression of the different B- and T-cell related antigens, each case was assigned to a given differentiation stage. B-lineage ALL were classified in five subgroups (B0-B4) and T-lineage ALL in four subgroups (T0-T3). Cases in which the blasts were lymphoid according to the FAB criteria, but expressed myeloid antigens in association with B- and T-lymphoid markers were defined as hybrid leukemias. As expected, CD10+ cases (B2-B3) were the most frequent within the B-lineage ALL (83.2% of cases). CyIg+ (B3) accounted for about 20% of CD10+ ALL. Twenty eight cases (13.4%) were at a pre-cALL stage (B0-B1) and of these, 8 (3.8% of the total series) were positive only for TdT and HLA-Dr (B0). Intermediate and mature thymic phenotypes (T2-T3) were predominant within the T-ALL (67.2%) groups. Five cases, were positive only for TdT and CD7 (CD5+), and classified as T0. 9.2% of cases fulfilled the definition of hybrid leukemia, largely in view of the co-expression of B-lymphoid and myeloid markers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用一组单克隆抗体,在诊断时确定了304例根据FAB标准诊断的成人淋巴细胞白血病(年龄>18岁)的免疫表型。该系列病例包括1988年4月至1991年6月期间在43个意大利中心(GIMEMA合作组)诊断并进行免疫表型分析的病例。免疫表型特征分析包括两个连续步骤。初步筛选基于对末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶(TdT)、人类白细胞抗原-Dr(HLA-Dr)、CD7、CD10、CD13、CD19、CD24、CD33和CD41的反应性。根据所得结果,第二步研究评估胞浆内(Cy)免疫球蛋白、CD1a、CD2、CD3、CD4、CD5、CD8和CD20的阳性情况。根据不同B细胞和T细胞相关抗原的分级表达,将每个病例归入特定的分化阶段。B系急性淋巴细胞白血病分为五个亚组(B0-B4),T系急性淋巴细胞白血病分为四个亚组(T0-T3)。根据FAB标准,原始细胞为淋巴细胞,但同时表达髓系抗原以及B淋巴细胞和T淋巴细胞标志物的病例被定义为混合性白血病。正如预期的那样,CD10阳性病例(B2-B3)在B系急性淋巴细胞白血病中最为常见(占病例的83.2%)。CyIg阳性(B3)约占CD10阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病的20%。28例(13.4%)处于前体B系急性淋巴细胞白血病阶段(B0-B1),其中8例(占总系列的3.8%)仅对TdT和HLA-Dr呈阳性(B0)。中间型和成熟胸腺表型(T2-T3)在T系急性淋巴细胞白血病组中占主导地位(67.2%)。5例仅对TdT和CD7呈阳性(CD5阳性),被归类为T0。9.2%的病例符合混合性白血病的定义,主要是因为同时表达B淋巴细胞和髓系标志物。(摘要截短于250词)