Gulabivala K, Briggs P F, Setchell D J
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Institute of Dental Surgery, London, UK.
Int Endod J. 1993 Jan;26(1):26-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00539.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare the dentine-removing characteristics of size 25 K-files activated by the Cavi-Endo and Piezon-Endo units. The influence of power-setting, direction of file oscillation, interfacial force and operator-assisted movement were studied. Filing was performed on flat surfaces of dentine and impressions of the instrumented surfaces revealed characteristic patterns of dentine removal corresponding to the area of contact with the file which was quantified using a Reflex microscope. Differences in dentine removal as affected by the power output of the two systems were only apparent when the maximum power-setting on the Cavi-Endo was compared with the maximum recommended for root canal preparation on the Piezon-Endo. The Cavi-Endo removed significantly more dentine than the Piezon-Endo. When operator-assisted movement of the file was superimposed, both systems removed significantly more dentine than without assisted filing, However, the Piezon-Endo now removed significantly more dentine than the Cavi-Endo. This difference was more apparent when the file oscillated perpendicular to the dentine surface, compared with oscillation parallel to the substrate. An increase in the interfacial force from 30 g to 60 g resulted in a greater reduction in dentine removal by the Cavi-Endo compared with the Piezon-Endo. Thus, at a 30 g interfacial force there were insignificant differences between the endosonic units but at 60 g, the Piezon-Endo removed significantly more dentine than the Cavi-Endo. The dentine-removing characteristics of the two endosonic units tested are very different under certain conditions. These findings may have important clinical implications.
本研究的目的是比较由Cavi-Endo和Piezon-Endo装置激活的25号K锉的牙本质去除特性。研究了功率设置、锉振荡方向、界面力和术者辅助运动的影响。在牙本质平面上进行锉削,对器械操作表面的印模进行观察,发现牙本质去除的特征模式与锉的接触面积相对应,使用反射显微镜对其进行量化。只有当将Cavi-Endo的最大功率设置与Piezon-Endo根管预备的最大推荐功率进行比较时,两种系统的功率输出对牙本质去除的影响差异才明显。Cavi-Endo去除的牙本质明显多于Piezon-Endo。当叠加术者辅助的锉运动时,与无辅助锉削相比,两种系统去除的牙本质都明显更多。然而,此时Piezon-Endo去除的牙本质明显多于Cavi-Endo。与平行于牙本质表面振荡相比,当锉垂直于牙本质表面振荡时,这种差异更明显。界面力从30 g增加到60 g时,与Piezon-Endo相比,Cavi-Endo导致的牙本质去除减少幅度更大。因此,在30 g的界面力下,两种超声装置之间的差异不显著,但在60 g时,Piezon-Endo去除的牙本质明显多于Cavi-Endo。在某些条件下,所测试的两种超声装置的牙本质去除特性非常不同。这些发现可能具有重要的临床意义。