• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荣格类型理论与迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标中的两极对立。

Bipolarity in Jungian type theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

作者信息

Girelli S A, Stake J E

机构信息

University of Missouri-St. Louis.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):290-301. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_7.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_7
PMID:8473967
Abstract

The standard form of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; Myers & McCaulley, 1985) was constructed to measure introversion/extroversion, sensing/intuiting, and thinking/feeling as single, bipolar dimensions. We tested this assumption of bipolarity with a Likert form of the MBTI that allowed for the independent assessment of each attitude and function. A total of 106 female and 59 male undergraduate and graduate students completed the standard and Likert MBTI forms approximately 3 weeks apart. Evidence for the bipolarity of the introversion/extroversion dimension was weak, and findings did not support the bipolarity of the sensing/intuiting or thinking/feeling dimensions. Results provide evidence that high negative correlations within MBTI dimensions are an artifact of its forced-choice format. Implications of the findings for typology measurement are discussed.

摘要

迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI;迈尔斯与麦考利,1985)的标准形式旨在将内向/外向、实感/直觉以及思考/情感作为单一的双极维度进行测量。我们使用MBTI的李克特量表形式对这种双极性假设进行了测试,该量表允许对每种态度和功能进行独立评估。共有106名女学生和59名男学生(包括本科生和研究生)在大约相隔3周的时间里分别完成了标准形式和李克特量表形式的MBTI测试。内向/外向维度双极性的证据很薄弱,研究结果也不支持实感/直觉或思考/情感维度的双极性。结果表明,MBTI各维度内的高负相关是其强制选择格式造成的假象。本文讨论了这些研究结果对类型学测量的启示。

相似文献

1
Bipolarity in Jungian type theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.荣格类型理论与迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标中的两极对立。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):290-301. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_7.
2
Personality styles of first-year dental students.一年级牙科学生的性格类型。
J Dent Educ. 1986 Apr;50(4):221-4.
3
Nonintellective intelligence and personality: variance shared by the Constructive Thinking Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):352-63. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_15.
4
Personality characteristics of hospice volunteers as measured by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):521-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_11.
5
Dental students' personality: a Jungian perspective.牙科学生的个性:荣格派观点。
J Dent Educ. 1982 Nov;46(11):646-51.
6
Personality characteristics of the crosscountry hitchhiker.
Adolescence. 1985 Fall;20(79):655-68.
7
Testing the bipolarity of the Jungian functions.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Oct;67(2):285-93. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_5.
8
Type T personality and the Jungian classification system.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Spring;54(1-2):231-5. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9673989.
9
Relationship between the MBTI and FIRO-B in a large British sample.
Psychol Rep. 2007 Dec;101(3 Pt 1):970-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.3.970-978.
10
The Myers-Briggs type indicator and coronary heart disease.
J Pers Assess. 1987 Winter;51(4):545-54. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5104_6.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the bipolar assumption of Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory for Korean adults using classification and multidimensional scaling.使用分类和多维尺度分析对韩国成年人的辛格-卢米斯类型部署量表的双极假设进行检验。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;14:1249185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249185. eCollection 2023.