Singer H K, Brabender V
Medical College of Pennsylvania, Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute.
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):333-45. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_10.
We compared the Rorschach performance (using the Comprehensive System; Exner, 1986) of 29 unipolar depressed, 15 bipolar depressed, and 18 bipolar manic inpatient subjects (N = 62) classified on the basis of the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC; Spitzer, Endicott, & Robbins, 1985). The three main groups differed from one another on a variety of variables, especially those related to ideation and information processing. One finding of particular importance was that bipolar depressed subjects, like bipolar manic and unlike unipolar depressed subjects, showed a high level of cognitive slippage. These results suggest that the Rorschach possesses utility in the differential diagnosis of affective disorders.
我们比较了29名单相抑郁、15名双相抑郁和18名双相躁狂住院患者（N = 62）的罗夏墨迹测验表现（使用综合系统；埃克斯纳，1986年），这些患者是根据研究诊断标准（RDC；斯皮策、恩迪科特和罗宾斯，1985年）分类的。这三个主要组在各种变量上彼此不同，尤其是那些与思维和信息处理相关的变量。一个特别重要的发现是，双相抑郁患者与双相躁狂患者一样，与单相抑郁患者不同，表现出高水平的认知失误。这些结果表明，罗夏墨迹测验在情感障碍的鉴别诊断中具有实用价值。
