• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Is homeopathy a false doctrine?].

作者信息

Hopff W H

机构信息

Pharmakologisches Institut, Universität Zürich.

出版信息

Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1993 Mar;141(3):241-7.

PMID:8474473
Abstract

We realize that it is virtually impossible to persuade the convinced practitioners of any of the pseudo-scientific beliefs. Therefore, it is our aim to support those fellow workers and interested laymen, intimidated by the contentions of homeopaths by providing them with relevant facts to counter the mostly absurd claims put forward by practitioners of alternative medicine. 1. The rule of "similarity" is based on incorrect assumptions. 2. Dilution = Dilution A dilution is neither a "potentization" nor a "dynamization" nor an "energyzation". All these expressions are not based on carefully defined notions or concepts but are merely literal creations of homeopaths. It is well known that the "Urtinktur" in addition to producing desired effects possesses a substantial number of undesired side effects. The reader might wonder why only the beneficial effects would be amplified ("potentiated") while all other side effects would happen to be attenuated ("diluted"). 3. The only evidence all practitioners of pseudo-medicine can muster to prove the efficacy of their methods are occasional healings following pseudo-medical treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Is homeopathy a false doctrine?].
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1993 Mar;141(3):241-7.
2
[History of "special therapeutic directions": the example of homeopathy].["特殊治疗方向的历史:顺势疗法的例子"]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Apr;90(2):91-6.
3
[The homeopathy problem in contemporary medicine].[当代医学中的顺势疗法问题]
Ann Ital Med Int. 1999 Jul-Sep;14(3):172-84.
4
Homeopathy within alternative and orthodox care.替代疗法与传统疗法中的顺势疗法
Med Interface. 1997 Jun;10(6):60-4.
5
Evidence and simplicity: why we should reject homeopathy.循证与简洁:为何我们应当摈弃顺势疗法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;16(2):276-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01384.x.
6
Complementary and alternative medicine.补充与替代医学
Anesthesiol Clin. 2006 Mar;24(1):81-111, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2005.12.008.
7
[Placebo action and alternative medicine].[安慰剂效应与替代医学]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Apr 21;120(16):581-8.
8
The ethics of alternative medicine therapies.替代医学疗法的伦理问题。
J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(4):447-70.
9
Alternative and complementary therapies.替代疗法和补充疗法。
Adolesc Med Clin. 2006 Oct;17(3):521-46; abstract ix. doi: 10.1016/j.admecli.2006.06.008.
10
The appeal of medical quackery: a rhetorical analysis.医学骗术的吸引力:一项修辞分析
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of conceptual criticisms of homeopathy.顺势疗法概念性批判的系统评价
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 21;9(11):e21287. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21287. eCollection 2023 Nov.