Reichel W
4. Medizinische Abteilung, Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien.
Z Gastroenterol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-91.
Five systems for computerized documentation (ADAM-Fujinon, ENDOBASE-Olympus, MEDASYS-Pentax, MEPAS-Fritsch & Jirak, OPTAMED-Krötlinger) are compared in their different functions: configuration of system, software, communication, structure of program, user guidance, data-protection, data back-up, patient registration, preparation for examination, terminology setup, report generation, image filing, statistic, system adjustments, costs. This paper should be a help in buying a computer-aided system. All systems fulfil the three basic requirements for a computer-aided documentation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: database, image filing, report generation. Actually none of the programs can be favoured. Peculiarities, weakness and strength of the different programs are discussed. The principle of the scoring-method in choosing a system is explained.
对五套计算机化文档系统（ADAM - 富士能、ENDOBASE - 奥林巴斯、MEDASYS - 宾得、MEPAS - 弗里奇和吉拉克、OPTAMED - 克罗特林格）的不同功能进行了比较：系统配置、软件、通信、程序结构、用户指南、数据保护、数据备份、患者登记、检查准备、术语设置、报告生成、图像存档、统计、系统调整、成本。本文应有助于购买计算机辅助系统。所有系统均满足胃肠内镜检查中计算机辅助文档的三项基本要求：数据库、图像存档、报告生成。实际上，没有一个程序具有明显优势。讨论了不同程序的特点、弱点和优点。解释了选择系统时评分方法的原则。
