• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经性贪食症:一项基于人群的清除型与非清除型对比研究。

Bulimia nervosa: a population-based study of purgers versus nonpurgers.

作者信息

Walters E E, Neale M C, Eaves L J, Heath A C, Kessler R C, Kendler K S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, MCV, Richmond 23298.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Apr;13(3):265-72. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199304)13:3<265::aid-eat2260130304>3.0.co;2-f.

DOI:10.1002/1098-108x(199304)13:3<265::aid-eat2260130304>3.0.co;2-f
PMID:8477298
Abstract

There has been recent interest in the possibility of dividing bulimia nervosa into two subtypes based on the method of weight prevention utilized by the individual. In an attempt to see if such a division is justified, this study compared 54 purging bulimics with 69 nonpurging bulimics ascertained from a population-based register of Virginia female twins. A bulimic was defined as a "purger" if she engaged in vomiting or laxative abuse. These two groups were examined on a variety of demographic, weight, and personality measures after controlling for the presence of obesity. No significant differences were found between the two groups on any of the variables examined.

摘要

最近,人们对根据个体所采用的体重控制方法将神经性贪食症分为两种亚型的可能性产生了兴趣。为了探究这种分类是否合理,本研究对从弗吉尼亚女性双胞胎的人群登记册中确定的54名清除型贪食症患者和69名非清除型贪食症患者进行了比较。如果一名贪食症患者有呕吐或滥用泻药行为,则被定义为“清除型”。在控制了肥胖因素后,对这两组患者进行了各种人口统计学、体重和性格方面的测量。在所检查的任何变量上,两组之间均未发现显著差异。

相似文献

1
Bulimia nervosa: a population-based study of purgers versus nonpurgers.神经性贪食症:一项基于人群的清除型与非清除型对比研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 1993 Apr;13(3):265-72. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199304)13:3<265::aid-eat2260130304>3.0.co;2-f.
2
Characteristics of monozygotic twins discordant for bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症不一致的同卵双胞胎的特征。
Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Jan;29(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(200101)29:1<1::aid-eat1>3.0.co;2-j.
3
Twin studies of adult psychiatric and substance dependence disorders: are they biased by differences in the environmental experiences of monozygotic and dizygotic twins in childhood and adolescence?成人精神疾病和物质依赖障碍的双生子研究:它们是否因同卵双胞胎和异卵双胞胎在童年和青少年时期环境经历的差异而存在偏差?
Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):625-33. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006643.
4
An examination of subtype criteria for bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症亚型标准的研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 1997 Sep;22(2):179-86. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199709)22:2<179::aid-eat10>3.0.co;2-x.
5
[Genetic determinants in anorexia nervosa. Results of twin studies].[神经性厌食症的遗传决定因素。双胞胎研究结果]
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1991;37(3):265-81.
6
Rorschach assessment of purging and nonpurging bulimics.罗夏墨迹测验对清除型和非清除型暴食症患者的评估
J Pers Assess. 1991 Apr;56(2):277-88. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5602_8.
7
Bulimic symptoms in the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development: correlates, comorbidity, and genetics.弗吉尼亚青少年行为发展双生子研究中的暴食症状:相关性、共病性及遗传学
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jan 15;51(2):172-82. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01257-4.
8
A comparison of family functioning, temperament, and childhood conditions in monozygotic twin pairs discordant for lifetime bulimia nervosa.对终生患神经性贪食症不一致的同卵双胞胎对的家庭功能、气质和童年状况进行比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;158(7):1155-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1155.
9
An empirical study of the classification of eating disorders.饮食失调分类的实证研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;157(6):886-95. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.886.
10
The developmental association between eating disorders symptoms and symptoms of depression and anxiety in juvenile twin girls.青少年双胞胎女孩饮食失调症状与抑郁和焦虑症状之间的发育关联。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;46(12):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01427.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Subtyping women with bulimia nervosa along dietary and negative affect dimensions: further evidence of reliability and validity.根据饮食和消极情绪维度对神经性贪食症女性进行亚型分类:可靠性和有效性的进一步证据。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Dec;76(6):1022-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013887.