Metzner W
University of California at San Diego, Neurobiology Unit, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla 92093-0202.
J Neurosci. 1993 May;13(5):1862-78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-05-01862.1993.
The gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia generates weakly electric signals for electrolocation and communication. The signals are produced by electric organ discharges (EODs) that are driven by a medullary pacemaker nucleus. To avoid jamming by neighboring conspecifics with similar frequencies, a fish raises its own EOD frequency if the neighbor's frequency is lower, and it lowers its EOD frequency if the neighbor's frequency is higher (Watanabe and Takeda, 1963). Both the raising and lowering of EOD frequency of this jamming avoidance response (JAR; Bullock et al., 1972) are thought to be controlled by feature-extracting neurons in the diencephalic prepacemaker nucleus (PPn-G) that discriminate the sign of the frequency difference between the jamming signal and the fish's EOD (Kawasaki et al., 1988a; Rose et al., 1988; for review, see Heiligenberg, 1991). These prepacemaker neurons are excited in response to lower jamming frequencies, thereby raising the frequency, and inhibited by higher jamming frequencies, producing a discharge deceleration. The results of experiments presented here, however, suggest a mechanism for the motor control of the JAR that is different from the one described previously (see, e.g., Heiligenberg, 1991). Two prepacemaker nuclei, one PPn-G and one sublemniscal prepacemaker nucleus (SPPn) (Keller et al., 1991 a,b), which provide the only known inputs to the pacemaker, were lesioned selectively. This article explores the effects of these lesions on the JAR. Pharmacological experiments were used to elucidate the transmitter types involved. The results suggest that the JAR is controlled by two separate motor pathways. One controls frequency rises and originates in the dorsal substructure of the nucleus electrosensorius (Keller, 1988). It sends excitatory connections to the diencephalic prepacemaker and finally to the pacemaker nucleus, where AMPA-type receptors mediate the synaptic transmission. The second pathway controls frequency decreases and originates in the ventral substructure of the nucleus electrosensorius. It provides GABAergic input to the SPPn. The SPPn is tonically active and also controls the EOD frequency even in the absence of jamming signals. Its projection to the pacemaker nucleus is mediated by NMDA-type receptors. The results of this study suggest that there is no single population of final, feature-extracting elements or "recognition units" that controls JAR-related shifts of the pacemaker frequency. Instead, the motor control of the JAR consists of an interaction of two independent pathways according to a "push-pull" principle.
裸背电鳗科鱼类艾氏电鳗会产生弱电信号用于电定位和通信。这些信号由电器官放电(EODs)产生,而电器官放电由延髓起搏器核驱动。为避免被频率相似的相邻同种个体干扰,若邻居的频率较低,鱼会提高自身的EOD频率;若邻居的频率较高,鱼则会降低自身的EOD频率(渡边和武田,1963年)。这种避免干扰反应(JAR;布洛克等人,1972年)中EOD频率的升高和降低,被认为是由间脑前起搏器核(PPn - G)中的特征提取神经元控制的,这些神经元能区分干扰信号和鱼的EOD之间频率差的正负(川崎等人,1988年a;罗斯等人,1988年;综述见黑林伯格,1991年)。这些前起搏器神经元在受到较低干扰频率时会被兴奋,从而提高频率,而受到较高干扰频率时会被抑制,导致放电减速。然而,本文所展示的实验结果表明,JAR的运动控制机制与之前描述的不同(例如见黑林伯格,1991年)。两个前起搏器核,一个是PPn - G,另一个是亚丘系前起搏器核(SPPn)(凯勒等人,1991年a、b),它们是已知向起搏器提供唯一输入的结构,被选择性地损伤。本文探讨了这些损伤对JAR的影响。采用药理学实验来阐明所涉及的递质类型。结果表明,JAR由两条独立的运动通路控制。一条控制频率升高,起源于电感受器核的背侧亚结构(凯勒,1988年)。它向间脑前起搏器发送兴奋性连接,最终到达起搏器核,在那里AMPA型受体介导突触传递。第二条通路控制频率降低,起源于电感受器核的腹侧亚结构。它向SPPn提供GABA能输入。SPPn持续活跃,即使在没有干扰信号的情况下也控制EOD频率。它向起搏器核的投射由NMDA型受体介导。这项研究的结果表明,不存在单一的最终特征提取元件或“识别单元”群体来控制与JAR相关的起搏器频率变化。相反,JAR的运动控制由两条独立通路根据“推 - 拉”原则相互作用组成。