• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How to evaluate study methodology in published clinical research.

作者信息

Stoddard G J, Ring W H

出版信息

J Intraven Nurs. 1993 Mar-Apr;16(2):110-7.

PMID:8478779
Abstract

When reading a clinical research article, the clinician must judge if the reported findings and conclusions are valid before applying them to patient care. This concern is legitimate given the wide range of study validity in the clinical literature. In this article, the authors present many validity markers that signify the quality of the information reported from a study, such as authorship, bias, confounding, statistics, randomization, controls, blinding, and the logical framework of scientific investigations.

摘要

相似文献

1
How to evaluate study methodology in published clinical research.
J Intraven Nurs. 1993 Mar-Apr;16(2):110-7.
2
Parallels between research and diagnosis: the reliability and validity issues of clinical practice.
Nurse Pract. 1991 Oct;16(10):42, 45, 49-50.
3
[Criteria of scientific validity in research].[研究中的科学有效性标准]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2002 Mar(68):35-42.
4
Strategies for salivary cortisol collection and analysis in research with children.儿童研究中唾液皮质醇采集与分析的策略
Appl Nurs Res. 2006 May;19(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.02.001.
5
Accurate data: the basis of decision.准确的数据:决策的基础。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 1993 Feb;15(4):163-8; discussion 168-9.
6
Quality issues in clinical research and the implications on health policy (QICRHP).
J Prof Nurs. 2001 Sep-Oct;17(5):233-42. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2001.26308.
7
Clinical research 3: Sample selection.临床研究3:样本选择。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Oct;15(4):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Apr 8.
8
Bias in surgical research.外科研究中的偏倚
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):180-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf4b.
9
The nursing research process.护理研究过程。
Nephrol Nurs J. 2007 Nov-Dec;34(6):635-43.
10
A critique of Michael L. Millenson's book, Demanding medical excellence: doctors and accountability in the information age, and its relevance to CRNAs and nursing.对迈克尔·L·米伦森所著《追求卓越医疗:信息时代的医生与问责制》一书的评论,以及该书与麻醉护士和护理工作的相关性。
AANA J. 1998 Dec;66(6):575-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products.一种用于对天然产物随机对照试验进行批判性评价的工具的开发与评估。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009 Apr 23;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-11.