Tang E L, Wei S H
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Sai Ying Pun.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Apr;103(4):344-51. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70015-G.
The methods of recording and measuring malocclusion can be broadly divided into two types: qualitative and quantitative. Among the qualitative methods of recording malocclusion, Angle's method of classifying malocclusion with or without modifications is probably the most widely used. The "WHO/FDI Basic Method for Recording of Malocclusion" was published in 1979 to establish an assessment format to determine the prevalence of malocclusion and to estimate treatment needs of a population. Among the many occlusion indices developed by various research workers, the occlusal index developed by Summers appeared to have the least amount of bias, is best correlated with clinical standards and has the highest validity during time. More recently, methods have also been developed to enable assessment of treatment need according to grade index scales. However, experience in using these methods is still very limited.
定性和定量。在记录错牙合畸形的定性方法中,安氏对错牙合畸形进行分类(有或无修正)的方法可能是使用最广泛的。1979年发布了“世界卫生组织/国际牙科联合会错牙合畸形记录基本方法”,以建立一种评估形式,用于确定错牙合畸形的患病率并估计人群的治疗需求。在众多研究人员开发的咬合指数中,萨默斯开发的咬合指数似乎偏差最小,与临床标准相关性最佳,且随时间推移有效性最高。最近,还开发了一些方法,以便能够根据分级指标量表评估治疗需求。然而,使用这些方法的经验仍然非常有限。