Hartman J C, Hullinger T G, Wall T M, Shebuski R J
Upjohn Laboratories, Kalamazoo, MI 49001.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Apr 6;234(2-3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90958-k.
The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramiprilat, the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan, angiotensin II, ramiprilat plus angiotensin II, or saline (N = 6 each group), were administered i.v. in anesthetized, open-chest rabbit preparations of acute myocardial ischemia. Animals were instrumented for measurement of systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular +dP/dtmax, then subjected to 30 min of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion (marginal branch) followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Ramiprilat (50 micrograms/kg), losartan (10 mg/kg), or saline were administered prior to reperfusion, and angiotensin II (2.5 ng/kg per min) was infused 15 min prior to occlusion and throughout the remainder of the experiment. Losartan was supplemented (10 mg/kg) after 1 h of reperfusion. These non-hypotensive doses of ramiprilat and losartan were demonstrated to significantly antagonize the systemic pressor effects of i.v. challenge with angiotensin I (15% of control, maximum) and II (5% of control, maximum), respectively, for the duration of the experiment. Systemic hemodynamic and +dP/dtmax changes due to occlusion/reperfusion or drug administration were similar between treatment groups. Infarct size was measured post-experimentally using tetrazolium staining and is reported as a percent of area at risk. Infarct size/area at risk (%) was significantly lower in rabbits administered ramiprilat only (20 +/- 6%) or ramiprilat plus angiotensin II (26 +/- 5%), compared to those receiving saline (41 +/- 6%), angiotensin II (51 +/- 4%), or losartan (52 +/- 4%, mean +/- S.E.M., * P < 0.05). These data indicate that direct angiotensin II receptor stimulation or receptor antagonism does not alter the degree of myocardial necrosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在麻醉开胸的急性心肌缺血兔模型中,静脉注射血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利拉、血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂氯沙坦、血管紧张素II、雷米普利拉加血管紧张素II或生理盐水(每组n = 6)。动物被安装仪器以测量全身血流动力学和左心室 +dP/dtmax,然后进行30分钟的左前降支冠状动脉闭塞(边缘支),随后再灌注2小时。在再灌注前给予雷米普利拉(50微克/千克)、氯沙坦(10毫克/千克)或生理盐水,在闭塞前15分钟及整个实验剩余时间内输注血管紧张素II(2.5纳克/千克每分钟)。再灌注1小时后补充氯沙坦(10毫克/千克)。在实验过程中,这些非低血压剂量的雷米普利拉和氯沙坦分别显著拮抗静脉注射血管紧张素I(最大为对照的15%)和II(最大为对照的5%)的全身升压作用。各治疗组因闭塞/再灌注或药物给药引起的全身血流动力学和 +dP/dtmax变化相似。实验后使用四氮唑染色测量梗死面积,并报告为危险区域面积的百分比。与接受生理盐水(41 ± 6%)、血管紧张素II(51 ± 4%)或氯沙坦(52 ± 4%,平均值 ± 标准误,P < 0.05)的兔子相比,仅接受雷米普利拉(20 ± 6%)或雷米普利拉加血管紧张素II(26 ± 5%*)的兔子梗死面积/危险区域(%)显著降低。这些数据表明,直接刺激血管紧张素II受体或拮抗该受体不会改变心肌坏死程度。(摘要截断于250字)