Sympson C J, Singleton D, Geoghegan T E
Department of Biochemistry, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Kentucky 40292.
Exp Cell Res. 1993 Apr;205(2):225-31. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1080.
There is a dynamic equilibrium between monomeric G-actin and polymeric F-actin microfilaments (MFs) in eucaryotic cells. We have previously shown that disruption of MFs with cytochalasin D (CD) induced beta-actin gene transcription, resulting in elevated levels of beta-actin mRNA and protein synthesis. CD also inhibited cell growth by arresting progression through the S phase of the cell cycle. These CD-induced responses were reversible since recovering cells progressed through the G2 phase and resumed normal growth while beta-actin mRNA and protein synthesis rapidly returned to control levels. In the present study, we show that the response of beta- and gamma-actin genes is due to the synthesis of a protein(s) acting at a 5' regulatory element that may be independent of or require sequences in addition to the serum response element (SRE). CD induces beta- and gamma-actin mRNA in a dose-dependent manner, reaching a maximum of 20-fold over control mRNA levels at 30 microM. beta- and gamma-Actin gene expression was also induced 5-fold by serum stimulation of quiescent murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells, while combined treatment with serum and CD had an additive effect. Two protein synthesis inhibitors, cycloheximide and puromycin, blocked the CD-induced increase in beta-actin mRNA, in contrast to the serum-induced increase which is insensitive to inhibitors of protein synthesis. The rapid return of beta-actin mRNA to basal levels following CD removal did not require protein synthesis nor did it require progression through the G2 phase of the cell cycle. A vector containing the 5' end of the beta-actin gene linked to a CAT reporter responded to CD when transfected into MEL cells, localizing the responsive element to the 5' portion of the beta-actin gene. By contrast, a minimal 99-bp actin promoter-CAT construct containing a functional SRE did not respond to CD.
在真核细胞中,单体G-肌动蛋白和聚合态F-肌动蛋白微丝(MFs)之间存在动态平衡。我们之前已经表明,用细胞松弛素D(CD)破坏MFs会诱导β-肌动蛋白基因转录,导致β-肌动蛋白mRNA水平升高和蛋白质合成增加。CD还通过阻止细胞周期S期进程来抑制细胞生长。这些CD诱导的反应是可逆的,因为恢复后的细胞会进入G2期并恢复正常生长,同时β-肌动蛋白mRNA和蛋白质合成迅速恢复到对照水平。在本研究中,我们表明β-和γ-肌动蛋白基因的反应是由于一种作用于5'调控元件的蛋白质的合成,该调控元件可能独立于血清反应元件(SRE),或者除了SRE之外还需要其他序列。CD以剂量依赖的方式诱导β-和γ-肌动蛋白mRNA,在30μM时比对照mRNA水平最高增加20倍。血清刺激静止的小鼠红白血病(MEL)细胞也可诱导β-和γ-肌动蛋白基因表达增加5倍,而血清和CD联合处理具有相加效应。两种蛋白质合成抑制剂,环己酰亚胺和嘌呤霉素,可阻断CD诱导的β-肌动蛋白mRNA增加,而血清诱导的增加对蛋白质合成抑制剂不敏感。去除CD后,β-肌动蛋白mRNA迅速恢复到基础水平,这既不需要蛋白质合成,也不需要通过细胞周期的G2期。当将含有与CAT报告基因相连的β-肌动蛋白基因5'端的载体转染到MEL细胞中时,它对CD有反应,将反应元件定位到β-肌动蛋白基因的5'部分。相比之下,含有功能性SRE的最小99bp肌动蛋白启动子-CAT构建体对CD无反应。