Zangger P, Chevalley F, Moeschler O
Service Universitaire d'Orthopédie et de Traumatologie de l'Appareil Moteur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Suisse.
Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59(1):50-6.
Several physiological and anatomical methods of scoring severely injured patients have been developed since the 1970s, based on very large series of patients. In this study, 59 patients are assessed by the ISS (Injury Severity Score) and the RTS (Revised Trauma Score). The mean ISS is 28, and the mean RTS is 6; the overall evolution shows a 42.4% mortality. Analysis by the TRISS method shows 12 out of 18 "unexpected" deaths, the majority of which can be explained by the fact that the ISS underestimates severe neurological trauma, and that the RTS is not consistently obtained in the early patient notes in our emergency care system.
自20世纪70年代以来,基于大量患者数据,已开发出多种对重伤患者进行评分的生理和解剖学方法。在本研究中,59名患者通过损伤严重度评分(ISS)和修正创伤评分(RTS)进行评估。ISS的平均值为28,RTS的平均值为6;总体病情发展显示死亡率为42.4%。通过创伤和损伤严重度评分法(TRISS)分析显示,18例“意外”死亡中有12例,其中大多数原因可以解释为ISS低估了严重神经创伤,并且在我们的急救系统中,早期患者记录中并未始终如一地获得RTS。