Aronson S, Wiencek J G, Feinstein S B, Heidenreich P A, Zaroff J G, Walker R, Roizen M F
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, IL 60637.
Anesth Analg. 1993 May;76(5):964-70. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199305000-00008.
Sonicated albumin microspheres, a digitalizing ultrasound system, and a mathematical model for flow were used to determine whether blood flow in the canine kidney could be assessed with contrast ultrasound. Albunex ultrasound contrast microspheres were injected into the aorta while ultrasound images of the kidney and aorta were recorded simultaneously. Ultrasound data were obtained during contrast injections at 93 different renal blood flow rates in nine dogs. Contrast dose was calibrated to ultrasound system response for both aortic and renal images. A linear relationship between microbubble concentration used and pixel intensity was established (r = 0.89 for aortic images and r = 0.91 for renal images). Renal blood flow was manipulated from baseline by means of a hydraulic renal artery occluder and by intravenous dopamine or fenoldopam infusion. Blood flow calculated with contrast ultrasonography was compared with direct measurement obtained with an electromagnetic flow probe at each flow rate. Direct measurement correlated with rates calculated with contrast ultrasonography (r = 0.84, 95% confidence limits from 0.75 to 0.90). Overall, calculations tended to overestimate absolute flow measurements, and overestimation of flow tended to be greater during pharmacologically manipulated flow rates. We conclude the changes and trends in renal blood flow can be serially assessed in vivo with contrast ultrasonography, but technical limitations of present commercial ultrasounds systems preclude absolute quantification at this time.
使用超声处理的白蛋白微球、数字化超声系统和血流数学模型来确定是否可以通过超声造影评估犬肾血流。在将Albunex超声造影微球注入主动脉的同时,同步记录肾脏和主动脉的超声图像。在9只狗的93种不同肾血流速率下进行造影剂注射时获取超声数据。针对主动脉和肾脏图像,将造影剂剂量校准至超声系统响应。建立了所用微泡浓度与像素强度之间的线性关系(主动脉图像的r = 0.89,肾脏图像的r = 0.91)。通过液压肾动脉闭塞器以及静脉注射多巴胺或非诺多泮输注,使肾血流从基线开始进行调节。将超声造影计算得出的血流与在每个血流速率下用电磁血流探头进行的直接测量结果进行比较。直接测量结果与超声造影计算得出的速率相关(r = 0.84,95%置信区间为0.75至0.90)。总体而言,计算结果往往高估了绝对血流测量值,并且在药物调节血流速率期间,血流高估往往更大。我们得出结论,肾血流的变化和趋势可以通过超声造影在体内进行连续评估,但目前商用超声系统的技术局限性使得此时无法进行绝对定量。