• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病患者的强制入院——一项国际比较。

Compulsory admission of psychiatric patients--an international comparison.

作者信息

Riecher-Rössler A, Rössler W

机构信息

Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Apr;87(4):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03363.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03363.x
PMID:8488742
Abstract

The frequency of compulsory admissions to psychiatric hospitals varies considerably between countries and regions. However, the differences are partly artificial, as the figures available are not fully comparable; this is mainly owing to differing definitions of "compulsory" and the methodological shortcomings of most studies in this field. In addition, there are also clear real differences, most of which result from different legislation and administrative regulations. Characteristics of the patient that influence the risk of compulsory admission include diagnosis and certain sociodemographic and social factors. Most studies, however, are based on highly selected populations. Furthermore, the results depend heavily on the commitment frequency of a country and therefore eventually also on the restrictiveness of legislation. The lack of methodologically sound studies, internationally comparable data and internationally published information is regrettable, as international comparison and discussion would certainly be valuable, especially for countries that are in the process of re-evaluating their commitment criteria and mental health legislation.

摘要

精神病院强制收治的频率在不同国家和地区差异很大。然而,这些差异部分是人为造成的,因为现有的数据并不完全具有可比性;这主要是由于“强制”的定义不同以及该领域大多数研究在方法上的缺陷。此外,也存在明显的实际差异,其中大多数是由不同的立法和行政法规导致的。影响强制收治风险的患者特征包括诊断以及某些社会人口统计学和社会因素。然而,大多数研究基于高度特定的人群。此外,结果在很大程度上取决于一个国家的收治频率,因此最终也取决于立法的严格程度。缺乏方法严谨的研究、国际可比数据和国际发表的信息令人遗憾,因为国际比较和讨论肯定会有价值,特别是对于正在重新评估其收治标准和心理健康立法的国家。

相似文献

1
Compulsory admission of psychiatric patients--an international comparison.精神病患者的强制入院——一项国际比较。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Apr;87(4):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03363.x.
2
[Compulsory admission of psychiatric patients in a national and international comparison--incidence and factors of influence].[国内外比较下精神科患者的强制入院——发病率及影响因素]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1992 Oct;60(10):375-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999157.
3
[Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European union member States].[欧盟成员国中精神疾病患者的强制收治]
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Jan;31(1):34-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-812569.
4
[Immediate compulsory commitment in Germany, 1991-1992: initial results].[1991 - 1992年德国的即时强制收治:初步结果]
Psychiatr Prax. 1994 May;21(3):118-20.
5
[Compulsory admission to hospital in Tunisia: a necessary evolution].[突尼斯的强制住院治疗:一次必要的演变]
Soins Psychiatr. 2015 Jul-Aug(299):36-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2015.05.001.
6
Psychiatric morbidity and compulsory admission.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;164(2):267. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.2.267a.
7
[For and against: increase of compulsory admissions of psychiatric patients].
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 May;33(4):157-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932578.
8
Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States.欧盟成员国中精神病患者的强制收治
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;39(10):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0814-9.
9
Detention of the mentally ill in Europe--a review.欧洲对精神病患者的拘留——综述
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 Jul;106(1):3-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02268.x.
10
Compulsory admissions to mental hospitals: a replication study.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1990;13(3):179-90. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(90)90014-t.

引用本文的文献

1
Involuntary Hospitalizations in an Italian Acute Psychiatric Ward: A 6-Year Retrospective Analysis.意大利一家急性精神科病房的非自愿住院治疗:一项为期6年的回顾性分析。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Dec 14;17:3403-3420. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S437116. eCollection 2023.
2
COVID-19 restrictions and visitations to an Israeli psychiatric emergency department: A four-lockdowns retrospective study.COVID-19 限制措施与以色列精神科急诊部探访:四次封锁的回顾性研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Jan;319:115004. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.115004. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
3
Psychiatric patients' attitudes towards being hospitalized: a national multicentre study in Norway.
挪威全国多中心研究:精神科患者对住院治疗的态度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04362-8.
4
Predicting involuntary hospitalization in psychiatry: A machine learning investigation.预测精神病学中的非自愿住院:一项机器学习研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 8;64(1):e48. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2220.
5
Measuring the level of compulsory hospitalisation in mental health care: The performance of different measures across areas and over time.测量精神卫生保健中的强制住院水平:不同措施在不同地区和不同时间的表现。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep;30(3):e1881. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1881. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Clinical and social factors associated with increased risk for involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis.与非自愿精神科住院风险增加相关的临床和社会因素:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和叙述性综合分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;6(12):1039-1053. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30406-7.
7
Criteria for compulsory admission in some European countries.一些欧洲国家的强制入院标准。
Int Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 1;8(3):68-71. eCollection 2011 Aug.
8
Compulsory Admission to Psychiatric Wards-Who Is Admitted, and Who Appeals Against Admission?强制收治到精神科病房——哪些人被收治,哪些人对收治提出上诉?
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 9;10:544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00544. eCollection 2019.
9
Characteristics of Psychiatric Emergency Situations and the Decision-Making Process Leading to Involuntary Admission.精神科紧急情况的特征以及导致非自愿住院的决策过程。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 18;9:760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00760. eCollection 2018.
10
Factors associated with involuntary hospitalisation for psychiatric patients in Switzerland: a retrospective study.瑞士与精神科患者非自愿住院相关的因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1966-6.