Lederer K J
University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr;5(2):240-4.
Transcervical tubal cannulation and salpingoscopy are two recent techniques used for the evaluation of tubal patency and pathology. Selective tubal cannulation cannot determine the nature of the obstructive process, although it does allow for the demonstration of potential tubal patency. This may be important in deciding whether therapies requiring tubal patency may be used in specific clinical situations. Because currently there are no controlled studies in the literature evaluating this technique, the therapeutic value of the procedure must be considered unproven at this time. Salpingoscopy gives more detailed information concerning the tubal mucosa. The identification of specific tubal lesions has been described with this modality. The predictive value of salpingoscopy in cases of severe anatomic distortion, ie, fibrous obliteration, seems obvious. However, its predictive value in the presence of more subtle lesions needs to be studied further because its role as a therapeutic modality is as yet undefined.
经宫颈输卵管插管术和输卵管镜检查是最近用于评估输卵管通畅性和病变的两项技术。选择性输卵管插管术虽能显示潜在的输卵管通畅情况,但无法确定梗阻过程的性质。这在决定特定临床情况下是否可采用需要输卵管通畅的治疗方法时可能很重要。由于目前文献中尚无评估该技术的对照研究,所以此时该手术的治疗价值尚未得到证实。输卵管镜检查能提供有关输卵管黏膜的更详细信息。通过这种方式已描述了特定输卵管病变的识别。输卵管镜检查在严重解剖结构扭曲(即纤维性闭塞)病例中的预测价值似乎很明显。然而,其在存在更细微病变时的预测价值仍需进一步研究,因为其作为一种治疗方式的作用尚未明确。