Bollschweiler E, Boettcher K, Hoelscher A H, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K, Siewert J R
Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany.
Cancer. 1993 May 15;71(10):2918-25. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930515)71:10<2918::aid-cncr2820711006>3.0.co;2-v.
Differing survival rates have been reported between patients having undergone surgical intervention for the treatment of gastric carcinoma in Japan and Western industrialized countries. Through the actual availability of the data compiled at a major Japanese medical center (National Cancer Center, Tokyo), it was possible, for the first time, to compare the patients and therapeutic results of a Japanese center (n = 1475) with that of a German center (Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich; n = 453).
The prognostic factors involving both groups were compared. Survival rates were analyzed in univariate and multivariate fashions.
Some of the examined prognostic factors, such as sex, histologic type, tumor size, and Borrmann classification, were similarly distributed. Differences in frequency were discovered concerning pathologic tumor (pT), node (pN), and metastasis (pM) categories, localization, and age groups. Univariate analysis showed a 2-year survival rate of 88% for all Japanese patients with gastric cancer compared with 58% for German patients. The 5-year survival rates were 77% and 44%, respectively. The difference in the 2-year and 5-year survival rates for both departments may be related to differences in frequencies of several characteristics. In performing the same analysis in a multivariate fashion for the patient populations at both centers, it became clear that an important prognostic factor was the center itself. The survival curves of patients from Tokyo and Munich with the same prognostic factors demonstrate this difference. These differences, however, were small in comparison with those of univariate analysis.
Using a similar classification of the tumor stage and similar prognostic characteristics, the prognosis for gastric cancer in Japan and Germany may be the same.
据报道,日本和西方工业化国家接受手术治疗的胃癌患者生存率存在差异。通过日本一家主要医疗中心(东京国立癌症中心)汇编数据的实际可得性,首次得以将日本中心(n = 1475)与德国中心(慕尼黑工业大学外科系,慕尼黑;n = 453)的患者及治疗结果进行比较。
对两组的预后因素进行比较。以单变量和多变量方式分析生存率。
一些经检查的预后因素,如性别、组织学类型、肿瘤大小和Borrmann分类,分布相似。在病理肿瘤(pT)、淋巴结(pN)和转移(pM)类别、定位及年龄组方面发现了频率差异。单变量分析显示,所有日本胃癌患者的2年生存率为88%,而德国患者为58%。5年生存率分别为77%和44%。两个科室2年和5年生存率的差异可能与几个特征的频率差异有关。对两个中心的患者群体进行多变量方式的相同分析时,很明显一个重要的预后因素是中心本身。具有相同预后因素的东京和慕尼黑患者的生存曲线证明了这种差异。然而,与单变量分析相比,这些差异较小。
采用相似的肿瘤分期分类和相似的预后特征,日本和德国胃癌的预后可能相同。