Vickery R M, Morley J W, Rowe M J
School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.
Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(2):332-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00228402.
Detection thresholds to step indentations applied to touch domes were measured and compared with threshold values obtained on adjacent areas of hairy skin. The mean of the detection thresholds determined on touch domes for five subjects was 504 +/- 27 microns (SEM). The detection thresholds found off the touch domes (2-3 mm away) were somewhat higher in all ten cases (two studies per subject), with a mean value of 587 +/- 28 microns, which was significant at the 0.01 level. These thresholds are an order of magnitude greater than those that elicit responses in touch-dome-associated slowly adapting type I (SAI) fibres in cats, and, together with the small difference between the detection thresholds determined on and off touch domes, indicate that the activity of single touch dome SAI fibres does not mediate the detection of steady indentation in the hairy skin.
测量了施加于触觉小体的阶梯状压痕的检测阈值,并将其与在相邻多毛皮肤区域获得的阈值进行比较。五名受试者在触觉小体上确定的检测阈值平均值为504±27微米(标准误)。在所有十例(每位受试者两项研究)中,在距触觉小体2 - 3毫米处测得的检测阈值略高,平均值为587±28微米,在0.01水平上具有显著性。这些阈值比在猫的与触觉小体相关的慢适应I型(SAI)纤维中引发反应的阈值高一个数量级,并且,触觉小体上和触觉小体外确定的检测阈值之间差异较小,这表明单个触觉小体SAI纤维的活动并不介导多毛皮肤中稳定压痕的检测。