Boccanelli A, Piazza V, Greco C, Zanchi E, Cecchetti C, Pontillo D, Pellanda J J, Risa A, Baragli D, Prati P L
Divisione Cardiologia A, Ospedale S. Camillo, Roma.
G Ital Cardiol. 1993 Jan;23(1):19-28.
To assess the safety and diagnostic value of dobutamine stress-echocardiography (DSE), we studied 109 patients with ischemic heart disease: 78 patients with recent myocardial infarction, 31 patients with chest pain (14 patients without and 17 patients with previous myocardial infarction). Echocardiograms were recorded during dobutamine infusion in 5-minute stages to a maximum dose of 40 mcg/kg/min. The test was considered positive when dobutamine infusion induced a new wall motion abnormality. In 95 pts with recent or previous myocardial infarction new asynergies were classified as being within the infarct zone or outside the infarct zone based on the relation with vascular zones at coronary angiography. All patients underwent exercise stress test (EST) according to the Bruce protocol, and coronary angiography within one week from the test: significant coronary artery disease was defined as > or = 50% diameter stenosis for left main artery and > or = 70% for the other vessels. Five patients (4.6%) had ventricular arrhythmias and 3 patients (2.7%) had systolic blood pressure increase > or = 200 mm Hg in the first stage of DSE, without new wall motion abnormalities, and were excluded from diagnostic value analysis. DSE had a sensitivity of 86% vs 56% of EST (p < 0.001); both had specificity of 94% and positive prognostic value of 98%; diagnostic accuracy of DSE was 87% vs 62% of EST (p < 0.001); negative predictive value was not statistically different. Sensitivity of DSE in single vessel disease (78%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than sensitivity in multivessel disease (95%). Sensitivity of DSE in detecting multivessel disease in patients with myocardial infarction was 80% vs 55% of EST (p < 0.05); specificity 96% vs 63% (p < 0.001); diagnostic accuracy 90% vs 60% (p < 0.001); positive predictive value 93% vs 48% (p < 0.001); negative predictive value 89% vs 70% (p < 0.05). At the ischemic threshold, EST caused the achievement of higher heart rate and rate-pressure product; in patients with single vessel disease heart rate was higher than in multivessel disease (141 +/- 19 vs 117 +/- 21, p < 0.001). No differences were detected during DSE in heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure product; the dose of dobutamine infused at the ischemic threshold in patients with multivessel disease was significantly lower than in those with single vessel disease (15.2 +/- 5.4 vs 19.4 +/- 6 mcg/kg/min, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
为评估多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)的安全性及诊断价值,我们对109例缺血性心脏病患者进行了研究:78例近期心肌梗死患者,31例胸痛患者(14例无既往心肌梗死,17例有既往心肌梗死)。在多巴酚丁胺输注过程中,以5分钟为阶段记录超声心动图,最大剂量为40 mcg/kg/min。当多巴酚丁胺输注诱发新的室壁运动异常时,该试验被视为阳性。在95例近期或既往有心肌梗死的患者中,根据与冠状动脉造影血管区域的关系,新出现的运动不协调被分类为梗死区内或梗死区外。所有患者均按照Bruce方案进行运动负荷试验(EST),并在试验后一周内进行冠状动脉造影:左主干动脉直径狭窄≥50%,其他血管直径狭窄≥70%被定义为严重冠状动脉疾病。5例患者(4.6%)在DSE第一阶段出现室性心律失常,3例患者(2.7%)收缩压升高≥200 mmHg,且无新的室壁运动异常,被排除在诊断价值分析之外。DSE的敏感性为86%,而EST为56%(p<0.001);两者的特异性均为94%,阳性预测值均为98%;DSE的诊断准确性为87%,而EST为62%(p<0.001);阴性预测值无统计学差异。DSE在单支血管病变中的敏感性(78%)显著低于多支血管病变中的敏感性(95%)(p<0.05)。DSE在检测心肌梗死患者多支血管病变中的敏感性为80%,而EST为55%(p<0.05);特异性为96%对63%(p<0.001);诊断准确性为90%对60%(p<0.001);阳性预测值为93%对48%(p<0.001);阴性预测值为89%对70%(p<0.05)。在缺血阈值时,EST导致心率和心率-血压乘积更高;在单支血管病变患者中,心率高于多支血管病变患者(141±19对117±21,p<0.001)。在DSE期间,未检测到心率、血压、心率-血压乘积的差异;多支血管病变患者在缺血阈值时输注的多巴酚丁胺剂量显著低于单支血管病变患者(15.2±5.4对19.4±6 mcg/kg/min,p<0.05)。(摘要截短至400字)