van Adrichem L N, Gultuna I, Mulder H D, Hovius S E, van Strik R, van der Meulen J C
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.3109/02844319309080287.
Between November 1985 and November 1988 11 patients developed arterial occlusion after microvascular anastomoses, 10 patients venous occlusions and five combined arterial and venous occlusions. We undertook a retrospective study to see whether colour, capillary refill, thermometry, or laser Doppler measurements could distinguish arterial and venous occlusions. Neither skin thermometry nor total backscattered light intensity change and flow band width (laser Doppler measurements) were significantly different (p > 0.05) between arterial and venous occlusions, but there were significant differences in colour (p = 0.006), capillary refill (p = 0.007), and laser Doppler flow (p = 0.02). The values obtained from cases with combined arterial and venous occlusions were like those of a venous occlusion or of an arterial occlusion or somewhere in between. Although none of the variables was diagnostic, we advise that the suspect vascular anastomosis should first be checked during reoperation. If an occluded anastomosis is found, one should also check the other anastomosis because occlusion of both artery and vein cannot be reliably detected.
在1985年11月至1988年11月期间,11例患者在微血管吻合术后发生动脉闭塞,10例患者发生静脉闭塞,5例患者发生动静脉联合闭塞。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以观察颜色、毛细血管再充盈、体温测量或激光多普勒测量是否能够区分动脉闭塞和静脉闭塞。在动脉闭塞和静脉闭塞之间,皮肤体温测量、总背向散射光强度变化和血流带宽(激光多普勒测量)均无显著差异(p>0.05),但在颜色(p=0.006)、毛细血管再充盈(p=0.007)和激光多普勒血流(p=0.02)方面存在显著差异。动静脉联合闭塞病例所获得的值类似于静脉闭塞或动脉闭塞的值,或介于两者之间。虽然没有一个变量具有诊断价值,但我们建议在再次手术时应首先检查可疑的血管吻合口。如果发现吻合口闭塞,还应检查另一个吻合口,因为不能可靠地检测到动静脉同时闭塞的情况。