Peterz M, Steneryd A C
National Food Administration, Biology Division, Uppsala, Sweden.
Int J Food Microbiol. 1993 May;18(3):211-21. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(93)90046-j.
Two methods of enumerating enterococci in foods were compared in a collaborative study. Thirteen laboratories tested four blind duplicate samples containing different levels of enterococci and two negative control samples. Freeze-dried mixtures of bacteria were used as simulated food samples. The freeze-dried samples were reconstituted and either spread directly on the surface of Slanetz and Bartley medium (SB) and incubated at 44 degrees C for 48 h or preincubated in tryptone soya agar at 37 degrees C for 2 h before being overlaid by SB and incubated at 37 degrees C for a further 46 h. The numbers CFU of enterococci recovered by the two methods were not significantly different except for one sample where the 37 degrees C method gave a somewhat higher recovery. The 44 degrees C method was less time-consuming and less laborious.
在一项合作研究中,对食品中肠球菌的两种计数方法进行了比较。13个实验室检测了4个含有不同水平肠球菌的盲法重复样品和2个阴性对照样品。使用冻干细菌混合物作为模拟食品样品。将冻干样品复溶后,要么直接涂布在Slanetz和Bartley培养基(SB)表面,于44℃培养48小时,要么先在胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂中于37℃预培养2小时,然后覆盖SB并于37℃再培养46小时。除了一个样品,两种方法回收的肠球菌菌落形成单位(CFU)数量没有显著差异,在该样品中37℃方法的回收率略高。44℃方法耗时更少且操作更简便。