Suppr超能文献

以患者预后为参考标准,比较口服胆囊造影术和超声检查对慢性胆囊炎的评估。

Comparison of oral cholecystography and ultrasonography for evaluating chronic cholecystitis using patient outcome as the reference standard.

作者信息

Renfrew D L, Witte D L, Berbaum K S, Barloon T J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 1993 May;28(5):404-8. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199305000-00003.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors compared oral cholecystography (OCG) with ultrasound (US) in the detection of chronic gallbladder disease using clinical outcome, rather than pathology results, as the reference standard.

METHODS

The authors interviewed 269 patients who underwent either OCG, US, or both, for evaluation of chronic right upper quadrant abdominal pain. The authors considered patients who underwent cholecystectomy with improved symptoms 1 to 4 years after surgery to be reference-standard positive for gallbladder disease, and patients with objective evidence of an alternative diagnosis (eg, peptic ulcer disease), which improved with therapy as reference-standard negative.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of OCG were 83% and 97%, respectively, and for US, 86% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

OCG is comparable with US in evaluating of chronic gallbladder disease. In institutions where OCG is used for diagnosing chronic cholecystitis, it may be reasonable to continue using OCG.

摘要

原理与目的

作者将口服胆囊造影术(OCG)与超声检查(US)进行比较,以临床结果而非病理结果作为参考标准来检测慢性胆囊疾病。

方法

作者对269例接受OCG、US或两者检查以评估慢性右上腹疼痛的患者进行了访谈。作者将术后1至4年症状改善的胆囊切除术患者视为胆囊疾病参考标准阳性,将有替代诊断客观证据(如消化性溃疡病)且经治疗症状改善的患者视为参考标准阴性。

结果

OCG的敏感性和特异性分别为83%和97%,US的敏感性和特异性分别为86%和90%。

结论

在评估慢性胆囊疾病方面,OCG与US相当。在使用OCG诊断慢性胆囊炎的机构中,继续使用OCG可能是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验