Mercado M, Carlsson L, Vitangcol R, Baumann G
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 May;76(5):1291-4. doi: 10.1210/jcem.76.5.8496320.
The recent development of an immunofunctional assay for GH-binding protein (GHBP) facilitates measurement of GHBP in biological fluids. Previous methods employed GH binding followed by size exclusion chromatography to determine GHBP levels (GH binding assay), and a considerable body of information exists based on data obtained with that type of assay. To cross-validate the two methods and permit comparison of results obtained in the two assays, we measured GHBP by both methods in 61 plasma samples from normal adults (aged 19-69), 10 patients with acromegaly, 2 patients with Laron dwarfism, and in a normal adult plasma pool. The results show a good overall correlation between the two methods (r = 0.669). However, for individual observations, the coefficient of determination was not high enough to permit interconversion of data with high precision. There is both biological and methodological variation in GHBP levels, rendering the interpretation of a single observation difficult except in the extreme range. The range of values was wider in the immunoassay (56-1187 pmol/L) than in the GH-binding assay (12.1-36.1% GH bound/400 microL). There was no significant sex difference in plasma GHBP levels, nor was there an age-dependent trend in adult subjects as assessed by both assays. Patients with acromegaly had significantly decreased GHBP levels in both assays, but the majority of the values were within the low normal range. The two patients with Laron dwarfism had undetectable GHBP in both assays. The previously defined unit of GHBP (i.e. the amount contained in 1 ml pooled adult plasma) corresponds to 256 fmol GHBP as determined by immunofunctional assay.
生长激素结合蛋白(GHBP)免疫功能测定法的最新进展有助于测定生物体液中的GHBP。以往的方法采用生长激素结合后进行尺寸排阻色谱法来测定GHBP水平(生长激素结合测定法),并且基于该类型测定法获得的数据已有大量信息。为了对这两种方法进行交叉验证并比较两种测定法得到的结果,我们用这两种方法对61例正常成年人(年龄19 - 69岁)、10例肢端肥大症患者、2例拉伦侏儒症患者的血浆样本以及一个正常成人大血浆池中的GHBP进行了测定。结果显示两种方法总体相关性良好(r = 0.669)。然而,对于个体观察值,决定系数不够高,无法高精度地进行数据相互转换。GHBP水平存在生物学和方法学上的差异,使得除了在极端范围内,对单个观察值的解释都很困难。免疫测定法的值范围(56 - 1187 pmol/L)比生长激素结合测定法(结合的生长激素/400 μL为12.1 - 36.1%)更宽。血浆GHBP水平在性别上无显著差异,两种测定法评估的成年受试者中也没有年龄依赖性趋势。肢端肥大症患者在两种测定法中GHBP水平均显著降低,但大多数值在正常低限范围内。两名拉伦侏儒症患者在两种测定法中均检测不到GHBP。通过免疫功能测定法确定,先前定义的GHBP单位(即1 ml混合成人血浆中所含的量)相当于256 fmol GHBP。