Suppr超能文献

大鼠鞘内注射 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂或腺苷受体激动剂后的脊髓血流

Spinal cord blood flow after intrathecal injection of a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist or an adenosine receptor agonist in rats.

作者信息

Kristensen J D, Karlsten R, Gordh T, Holtz A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1993 Jun;76(6):1279-83. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199306000-00016.

Abstract

Evaluation of spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) is important as a preclinical screening for potential neurotoxicologic side effects before introducing new therapeutic drugs for intrathecal (IT) administration. This study was undertaken to determine whether two drugs with possible antinociceptive effects, the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) and the adenosine agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA), would affect SCBF after IT administration in the rat. SCBF was measured 30 min after IT injection of either saline, 4 nmol of CPP or 10 nmol or R-PIA in anesthetized rats by quantitative autoradiography with [14C]iodantipyrine as a tracer. No differences in SCBF were found between groups treated with saline or CPP. In the group where R-PIA was administered IT, grey matter blood flow was 10% greater than in the group that received saline, whereas no differences were found in white matter blood flow or in the grey/white matter ratio between the groups. We concluded that neither CPP nor R-PIA, when administered IT to anesthetized rats in provocative doses within the upper pharmacologic dose range, reduces SCBF in rats 30 min after IT injection. This indicates that neither neurotoxicologic nor antinociceptive effects are likely to occur due to decrease in SCBF. Our results do not indicate that these drugs should be avoided for the treatment of pain.

摘要

在引入用于鞘内(IT)给药的新治疗药物之前,评估脊髓血流量(SCBF)作为潜在神经毒理学副作用的临床前筛查很重要。本研究旨在确定两种可能具有抗伤害感受作用的药物,即N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂3-(2-羧基哌嗪-4-基)丙基-1-膦酸(CPP)和腺苷激动剂R-苯异丙基腺苷(R-PIA),在大鼠IT给药后是否会影响SCBF。通过以[14C]碘安替比林作为示踪剂的定量放射自显影术,在麻醉大鼠中IT注射生理盐水、4 nmol CPP或10 nmol R-PIA后30分钟测量SCBF。生理盐水或CPP治疗组之间未发现SCBF有差异。在IT给予R-PIA的组中,灰质血流量比接受生理盐水的组高10%,而两组之间的白质血流量或灰质/白质比未发现差异。我们得出结论,当以药理学高剂量范围内的激发剂量对麻醉大鼠进行IT给药时,CPP和R-PIA在IT注射后30分钟均不会降低大鼠的SCBF。这表明SCBF降低不太可能导致神经毒理学或抗伤害感受作用。我们的结果并不表明这些药物应避免用于疼痛治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验