Suppr超能文献

内镜下套扎术与硬化剂注射疗法治疗食管静脉曲张出血的比较。

Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.

作者信息

Laine L, el-Newihi H M, Migikovsky B, Sloane R, Garcia F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, U.S.C. School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jul 1;119(1):1-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-1-199307010-00001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of endoscopic sclerotherapy and ligation for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

An urban county hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with clinically severe bleeding from esophageal varices.

INTERVENTION

A total of 77 patients were randomly assigned to receive sclerotherapy or ligation at the initial endoscopic examination. Treatment was repeated weekly until variceal obliteration was achieved. After eradication, patients had endoscopic examinations every 3 months or for any episode of rebleeding. Recurrent varices were treated with the originally assigned form of endoscopic therapy.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients were assessed for further bleeding, for transfusion requirements, for time in hospital, for variceal eradication, for number of treatment sessions required, for complications, for treatment failure, and for risk of death.

RESULTS

Rebleeding tended to be less frequent with ligation than with sclerotherapy: 10 of 38 (26%) compared with 17 of 39 (44%) (difference, 17% [95 CI, -4% to 38%]), but results in the two groups were comparable for blood transfusions, for length of hospital stay, and for risk of death. Comparison of Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to rebleeding and death showed no statistical differences between treatments. Complications were less common in the ligation group: fewer patients in the ligation group had esophageal strictures (0 of 38 compared with 13 of 39 [33%]; P < 0.001) and had complicated esophageal ulcers (1 of 38 [2.6%] compared with 6 of 39 [15%]; P = 0.11). In addition, fewer ligation treatments were required to achieve variceal eradication (4.1 +/- 0.3 compared with 6.2 +/- 0.4; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic ligation causes statistically fewer local complications than sclerotherapy and achieves variceal eradication more rapidly. Ligation is a viable alternative to sclerotherapy and may have some advantages as a treatment for bleeding esophageal varices.

摘要

目的

比较内镜下硬化疗法和套扎术治疗食管静脉曲张出血的安全性和有效性。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

一家城市县级医院。

患者

临床上有严重食管静脉曲张出血的患者。

干预措施

共77例患者在初次内镜检查时被随机分配接受硬化疗法或套扎术。每周重复治疗,直至静脉曲张闭塞。根除后,患者每3个月进行一次内镜检查或因任何再出血事件进行检查。复发性静脉曲张采用最初分配的内镜治疗形式进行治疗。

测量指标

评估患者是否有进一步出血、输血需求、住院时间、静脉曲张根除情况、所需治疗次数、并发症、治疗失败情况以及死亡风险。

结果

套扎术的再出血发生率往往低于硬化疗法:38例中有10例(26%),而39例中有17例(44%)(差异为17%[95%置信区间,-4%至38%]),但两组在输血、住院时间和死亡风险方面的结果相当。对再出血和死亡时间的Kaplan-Meier估计值进行比较,显示治疗组之间无统计学差异。套扎术组的并发症较少见:套扎术组发生食管狭窄的患者较少(38例中0例,而39例中有13例[33%];P<0.001),发生复杂性食管溃疡的患者也较少(38例中有1例[2.6%],而39例中有6例[15%];P = 0.11)。此外,实现静脉曲张根除所需的套扎治疗次数较少(4.1±0.3次与6.2±0.4次;P<0.001)。

结论

内镜下套扎术在统计学上引起的局部并发症比硬化疗法少,且能更快地实现静脉曲张根除。套扎术是硬化疗法的一种可行替代方法,作为食管静脉曲张出血的治疗方法可能具有一些优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验