In-vitro stability and cytostatic activity of liposomal formulations of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and its diacylated derivatives.

The water-soluble antineoplastic agent 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) was encapsulated in the water phase of liposomes of different lipid compositions. The retention of this drug upon storage and during contact with plasma was assessed. It was found that, upon refrigeration, diffusion of FUdR across the liposome bilayer was considerably faster when the drug was encapsulated in fluid-type liposomes (egg PC/PS/CHOL) than in solid-type liposomes (DSPC/DPPG/CHOL). With either composition, leakage of the drug from the liposomes was accelerated upon contact with plasma. To achieve improved liposomal retention of the drug, FUdR was converted to a lipophilic prodrug by esterifying the free hydroxyl groups in the deoxyribose moiety with fatty acids of different chain lengths. Thus FUdR-dipalmitate (C-16) and FUdR-dioctanoate (C-8) were synthesized and incorporated in liposomes. The dipalmitoyl derivative could be incorporated upto 13 mol% in solid-type liposomes but to only 2 mol% in fluid-type liposomes. Freeze-fracture electron microscopy revealed no major differences between control liposomes and those containing the prodrug. FUdR-dipalmitate was found to be firmly associated with the liposomal bilayer in both liposome-types: no exchange of the pro-drug with blood constituents or hydrolysis by serum esterases could be registered when the liposomes were incubated with serum. On the other hand, liposome-incorporated FUdR-dioctanoate was found to be readily extracted from the liposomes by serum components (predominantly albumin) and was found to be degraded rapidly by serum esterase activity. The antitumor activity of FUdR-prodrugs was determined using C26 colon adenocarcinoma cells. This cell line was found to be highly sensitive to FUdR. Liposomal FUdR-dioctanoate inhibited cell growth in the same concentration range as unesterified FUdR. FUdR-dipalmitate, however, was more than two orders of magnitude less potent in inhibiting cell proliferation. Its antiproliferative activity was dependent on the liposome-type used: when incorporated in fluid-type liposomes, antiproliferative activity of FUdR-dipalmitate was several-fold higher than in solid-type liposomes. The difference in antitumor activity between FUdR-dipalmitate and FUdR-dioctanoate and between FUdR-dipalmitate in the fluid- and solid-type liposomes could be explained by differences in the rate of hydrolysis of the prodrugs to FUdR by esterase activity in the tumor cells or in the growth medium.