Suppr超能文献

基于头痛诊所的国际头痛协会标准现场试验方法。

A headache clinic-based approach to field trials of the International Headache Society criteria.

作者信息

Solomon S, Lipton R B

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 1993 Apr;13 Suppl 12:63-5. doi: 10.1177/0333102493013S1213.

Abstract

Criteria for the diagnosis of headache disorders have recently been developed but require empirical validation. We present an approach to the evaluation of headache criteria in a headache clinic: define the group of headache sufferers to be studied, obtain data used in establishing the diagnosis, apply the diagnostic criteria and assess their usefulness. In applying this method to a group of patients with chronic daily headache, we found that approximately one-third would not fit the current criteria for chronic tension-type headache. We conclude that empiric validation of headache criteria based on subjective data is a complex and iterative process. Operational criteria for headache diagnosis to be used by primary care physicians should be validated in that setting and ideally should be relatively simple.

摘要

头痛疾病的诊断标准最近已经制定出来,但需要进行实证验证。我们提出了一种在头痛诊所评估头痛标准的方法:确定要研究的头痛患者群体,获取用于确立诊断的数据,应用诊断标准并评估其效用。在将这种方法应用于一组慢性每日头痛患者时,我们发现约三分之一的患者不符合当前慢性紧张型头痛的标准。我们得出结论,基于主观数据对头痛标准进行实证验证是一个复杂且反复的过程。基层医疗医生使用的头痛诊断操作标准应在该环境中得到验证,并且理想情况下应相对简单。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验