Lingström P, Imfeld T, Birkhed D
Department of Cariology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
J Dent Res. 1993 May;72(5):865-70. doi: 10.1177/00220345930720050601.
Three different techniques for measurement of plaque-pH--the sampling, the microtouch, and the telemetric methods--were compared after subjects had consumed different starch products. Ten volunteers, equipped with partial lower prostheses, incorporating a miniature glass pH electrode, refrained from toothbrushing for 3 days. Four products were tested: (1) soft bread, (2) potato chips, (3) 5% starch, and (4) 5% sucrose. The pH of plaque was measured for 45 min by means of all three of the methods. The results showed that the mean pH at 10 min was 1.5 units lower with the telemetric than with the sampling method and 1.0 unit lower with the telemetric than with the microtouch method. Relatively small differences were found among the effects of the four test products for all three methods, with the clearest distinctions among the pH curves being with the microtouch and telemetric methods. The main conclusions from the present investigation are: (1) that there were large differences in pH levels measured with the sampling, the microtouch, and the telemetric methods, even though they ranked the test products in about the same order, and (2) that the two starchy foods, bread and potato chips, were both easily fermented by dental plaque.
在受试者食用不同淀粉产品后,对三种不同的菌斑pH测量技术——采样法、微触法和遥测法进行了比较。十名佩戴带有微型玻璃pH电极的下颌局部假牙的志愿者,三天不刷牙。测试了四种产品:(1)软面包,(2)薯片,(3)5%淀粉,以及(4)5%蔗糖。使用这三种方法对菌斑pH进行了45分钟的测量。结果显示,遥测法在10分钟时的平均pH比采样法低1.5个单位,比微触法低1.0个单位。对于所有三种方法,四种测试产品的效果之间差异相对较小,pH曲线之间最明显的区别在于微触法和遥测法。本研究的主要结论是:(1)尽管采样法、微触法和遥测法对测试产品的排序大致相同,但它们测量的pH水平存在很大差异;(2)两种淀粉类食物,面包和薯片,都很容易被牙菌斑发酵。