Bornstein R F
Department of Psychology, Gettysburg College, Pennsylvania 17325.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Jun;181(6):337-44. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199306000-00001.
A review of the empirical literature on implicit perception and implicit memory reveals that Freud's hypotheses regarding free association, transference, and the recovery of unconscious material in therapy were correct in some areas and incorrect in others. Empirical evidence confirms that--as Freud hypothesized--when implicit (i.e., unconscious) perceptions and memories are made explicit (i.e., conscious), individuals are able to make more logical, realistic judgments and inferences regarding those perceptions and memories. However, empirical evidence does not support Freud's contention that free association is a particularly powerful tool for accessing unconscious material. The implications of these findings for psychoanalytic theory and therapy are discussed, and alternative approaches to accessing unconscious material in psychotherapy are described.
一项关于内隐知觉和内隐记忆的实证文献综述表明,弗洛伊德关于自由联想、移情以及治疗中无意识材料恢复的假设在某些方面是正确的,而在其他方面则是错误的。实证证据证实,正如弗洛伊德所假设的那样,当内隐(即无意识)知觉和记忆变得外显(即有意识)时,个体能够对这些知觉和记忆做出更符合逻辑、更现实的判断和推理。然而,实证证据并不支持弗洛伊德的观点,即自由联想是获取无意识材料的一种特别有效的工具。本文讨论了这些发现对精神分析理论和治疗的意义,并描述了心理治疗中获取无意识材料的替代方法。