Umezawa S, Shimizu K
Department of Ophthalmology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 May;19(3):371-4. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80308-2.
We evaluated the biocompatibility of three kinds of intraocular lenses: heparin-surface-modified, surface-passivated, and regular poly(methyl methacrylate). Each lens type was implanted in 30 eyes. The cases were followed for one year. Biocompatibility was assessed by the degree of postoperative inflammation and capsule opacification. There was no significant difference between the surface-passivated and regular groups on both indices, but there was less postoperative inflammation in the heparin-surface-modified group. The incidence of posterior capsule opacification was greater in the heparin-surface-modified group than in the surface-passivated and regular groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.
肝素表面改性的、表面钝化的和常规聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的。每种类型的晶状体均植入30只眼中。对这些病例进行了一年的随访。通过术后炎症程度和囊膜混浊情况评估生物相容性。在这两个指标上,表面钝化组和常规组之间无显著差异,但肝素表面改性组的术后炎症较少。肝素表面改性组后囊膜混浊的发生率高于表面钝化组和常规组,但差异无统计学意义。