Suppr超能文献

如何批判性地评估产科伦理学的立场。

How to critically evaluate positions on obstetric ethics.

作者信息

Chervenak F A, McCullough L B

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Hospital Cornell Medical Center, New York 10021.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1993 Apr;38(4):281-4.

PMID:8501735
Abstract

We identify three tools for the critical evaluation of positions on obstetric ethics. The first is the distinction between descriptive and normative obstetric ethics. The second comprises the "Six Cs" of rigorous ethical analysis and argument: clarity, consistency, coherence, clinical applicability, clinical adequacy and completeness. The third is the avoidance of pitfalls that might arise from failing to acknowledge the inherent limitations of fields that contribute to normative obstetric ethics: law, region, professional consensus, uses of authority and philosophy.

摘要

我们确定了三种用于批判性评估产科伦理立场的工具。第一种是描述性产科伦理与规范性产科伦理之间的区别。第二种包括严格伦理分析和论证的“六个C”:清晰性、一致性、连贯性、临床适用性、临床充分性和完整性。第三种是避免因未认识到对规范性产科伦理有贡献的领域(法律、地区、专业共识、权威的运用和哲学)的固有局限性而可能产生的陷阱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验