Grosskopf S, Valdmanis V
Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
Med Care. 1993 Jun;31(6):525-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00006.
In this article, we compared hospital efficiency using a multiple input-output approach in two ways: one way used a straightforward count of inpatient days and outpatient services as outputs; and the second used a case mix-adjusted count of inpatient services and outpatient care as outputs. Our results show that there was no difference when we incorporated the case-mix index, either as a weighting device or as a separate output. However, this result may be due to our having a relatively homogeneous sample, (i.e., large metropolitan hospitals). Variations using this approach may occur when using a more heterogeneous sample, such as comparing hospitals of all sizes or rural versus urban hospitals.
在本文中,我们采用多投入-产出方法从两个方面比较了医院效率:一种方法是直接将住院天数和门诊服务次数作为产出进行计算;另一种方法是将经过病例组合调整后的住院服务次数和门诊护理作为产出。我们的结果表明,无论是将病例组合指数作为加权工具还是作为单独的产出纳入计算,结果并无差异。然而,这一结果可能是由于我们的样本相对同质(即大型都市医院)。当使用更具异质性的样本时,比如比较各种规模的医院或农村与城市医院时,采用这种方法可能会出现差异。