Rinder H M, Munz U J, Ault K A, Bonan J L, Smith B R
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Jun;117(6):606-10.
The laboratory diagnosis of immune platelet destruction has relied predominantly on the presence or absence of megakaryocytes in bone marrow. Recently, examination of peripheral blood platelets for high RNA content (reticulated platelets) or for elevated levels of platelet-associated IgG have been suggested as less invasive diagnostic tests. We used thiazole orange fluorescence labeling to determine the percentage of circulating reticulated platelets and two antibodies with different specificities directed against human IgG to measure platelet-associated IgG by flow cytometry in 59 patients with either immune thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 23) or chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (n = 36). The percentage of reticulated platelets in patients with immune thrombocytopenia was significantly increased (38.6% +/- 27.4% [mean +/- 1 SD]), compared with patients receiving chemotherapy and normal subjects (7.2% +/- 3.3% and 2.9% +/- 2.2%, respectively). However, 17% of patients with immune thrombocytopenia had reticulated platelet values in the range observed for normal subjects and for patients with chemotherapy. Although one third of patients with immune thrombocytopenia had very high platelet IgG levels, the majority could not be distinguished from patients receiving chemotherapy solely on this basis. Combining the reticulated platelet determination with the IgG data did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of the reticulated platelet determination alone. We conclude that a flow cytometric assay for reticulated platelets is a better discriminant than flow-measured platelet IgG for diagnosing immune platelet destruction. We further postulate that the subset (17%) of patients with immune destruction who have relatively low percentages of reticulated platelets may represent patients with an inappropriately low thrombopoietic response.
免疫性血小板破坏的实验室诊断主要依赖于骨髓中巨核细胞的有无。最近,有人提出检测外周血血小板中高RNA含量(网织血小板)或血小板相关IgG水平升高作为侵入性较小的诊断试验。我们使用噻唑橙荧光标记来确定循环中网织血小板的百分比,并使用两种针对人IgG具有不同特异性的抗体,通过流式细胞术测量59例免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(n = 23)或化疗诱导的血小板减少症(n = 36)患者的血小板相关IgG。免疫性血小板减少症患者的网织血小板百分比显著增加(38.6%±27.4%[平均值±1标准差]),与接受化疗的患者和正常受试者相比(分别为7.2%±3.3%和2.9%±2.2%)。然而,17%的免疫性血小板减少症患者的网织血小板值在正常受试者和化疗患者观察到的范围内。虽然三分之一的免疫性血小板减少症患者的血小板IgG水平非常高,但大多数患者仅据此无法与接受化疗的患者区分开来。将网织血小板测定与IgG数据相结合并没有提高单独的网织血小板测定的敏感性或特异性。我们得出结论,流式细胞术检测网织血小板比流式测量血小板IgG更能鉴别免疫性血小板破坏。我们进一步推测,网织血小板百分比相对较低的免疫性破坏患者亚组(17%)可能代表血小板生成反应过低的患者。