• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对国家药品报销政策研究的批判性分析:亟需规范的研究。

A critical analysis of studies of state drug reimbursement policies: research in need of discipline.

作者信息

Soumerai S B, Ross-Degnan D, Fortess E E, Abelson J

机构信息

Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1993;71(2):217-52.

PMID:8510601
Abstract

Concerns over pharmaceutical costs and appropriateness of medication use have led state Medicaid programs to restrict drug reimbursement. This article critically reviews 20 years of research on cost sharing, drug reimbursement limits, and administrative limitations on access to particular drugs via formularies, category exclusions, or prior authorization requirements; evaluates their methodological rigor; summarizes the state of current knowledge; and proposes future research directions. Drug reimbursement caps and modest cost sharing can reduce the use of both essential and less important drugs in Medicaid populations; severe reimbursement caps may precipitate serious unintended effects. Limitations on access to particular drugs can cause both rational and irrational drug substitution effects; it is unclear whether such limits reduce expenditures either for drugs or for overall health care.

摘要

对药品成本和用药合理性的担忧导致各州医疗补助计划限制药品报销。本文批判性地回顾了20年来关于费用分担、药品报销限额以及通过药品目录、类别排除或事先授权要求对获取特定药品进行行政限制的研究;评估了这些研究方法的严谨性;总结了当前的知识状况;并提出了未来的研究方向。药品报销上限和适度的费用分担会减少医疗补助人群中基本药物和非基本药物的使用;严格的报销上限可能会引发严重的意外后果。对获取特定药品的限制可能会导致合理和不合理的药物替代效应;尚不清楚此类限制是否会降低药品或整体医疗保健的支出。

相似文献

1
A critical analysis of studies of state drug reimbursement policies: research in need of discipline.对国家药品报销政策研究的批判性分析:亟需规范的研究。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(2):217-52.
2
Differences in the cost of antidepressants across state Medicaid programs.各州医疗补助计划中抗抑郁药物成本的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Mar;11(1):33-47.
3
States' control of prescription drug spending: a heterogeneous approach.各州对处方药支出的控制:一种差异化方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1032-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1032.
4
Access and cost implications of state limitations on Medicaid reimbursement for pharmaceuticals.州政府对医疗补助药品报销的限制所带来的获取和成本影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:399-410. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.002151.
5
Unintended outcomes of medicaid drug cost-containment policies on the chronically mentally ill.医疗补助药品成本控制政策对慢性精神病患者产生的意外后果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 17:19-22.
6
Medicaid prescription drug coverage: state efforts to control costs.医疗补助处方药覆盖范围:各州控制成本的举措
NHPF Issue Brief. 2003 May 10(790):1-17.
7
Managing prescription drug costs.管理处方药成本。
Empl Benefits J. 2001 Mar;26(1):35-40.
8
Medicaid program; Drug Use Review program and electronic claims management system for outpatient drug claims--HCFA. Interim final rule with comment period.
Fed Regist. 1992 Nov 2;57(212):49397-412.
9
Escalating need for comparative analysis of drugs within a therapeutic class.对治疗类别内药物进行比较分析的需求不断增加。
Manag Care Interface. 2003 Oct;16(10):32-4.
10
Trends in prescription drug expenditures by Medicaid enrollees.医疗补助计划参保者的处方药支出趋势。
Med Care. 2006 May;44(5 Suppl):I27-35. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000208132.36055.84.

引用本文的文献

1
State drug caps associated with fewer Medicaid-covered prescriptions for opioid use disorder, 2017-2022.2017 - 2022年,州药物上限与医疗补助覆盖的阿片类药物使用障碍处方减少有关。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Dec 6;2(12):qxae165. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae165. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
COVID-19 pandemic and the consumption of self-care products for pediculosis capitis in Portugal: an interrupted time-series analysis.COVID-19 大流行与葡萄牙头虱病自护理产品的消费:一项中断时间序列分析。
Parasitol Res. 2024 Jun 8;123(6):235. doi: 10.1007/s00436-024-08258-2.
3
Antiepileptic prescribing to persons living with dementia residing in nursing homes: A tale of two indications.
抗癫痫药物在养老院居住的痴呆症患者中的处方应用:两种适应证的故事。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):89-97. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18119. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
4
A Road Map to Rigor and Relevance in Pharmaceutical Policy Research.制药政策研究中严谨性与相关性的路线图。
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):341-344. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12555. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Availability of secondary healthcare data for conducting pharmacoepidemiology studies in Colombia: A systematic review.哥伦比亚开展药物流行病学研究的二级医疗保健数据的可用性:系统评价。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;8(5):e00661. doi: 10.1002/prp2.661.
6
Insurance- and medical provider-related barriers and facilitators to staying on PrEP: results from a qualitative study.保险和医疗服务提供者相关的障碍和促进因素对 PrEP 的坚持:一项定性研究的结果。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):573-581. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz191.
7
Association of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care With the Use of Antipsychotics and Other Psychotropics in Long-term Care in the United States From 2009 to 2014.美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的国家合作伙伴关系与 2009 年至 2014 年美国长期护理中抗精神病药物和其他精神药物使用的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):640-647. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0379.
8
Impact of a Restriction in Reimbursement on Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with an Increased Risk of Gastric Complications.报销限制对胃并发症风险增加患者使用质子泵抑制剂的影响。
Front Public Health. 2018 Feb 27;6:51. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00051. eCollection 2018.
9
Drug pricing and reimbursement decision making systems in Mongolia.蒙古国的药品定价与报销决策系统
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Feb 27;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0098-6. eCollection 2017.
10
A randomized controlled trial of negative co-payments: the CHORD trial.负自付费用的随机对照试验:CHORD试验。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Aug;21(8):e465-73.