National Academy of Sciences enters controversy on relevance of animal toxicologic studies.
出版信息
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Apr 22;101(1):19.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
National Academy of Sciences enters controversy on relevance of animal toxicologic studies.
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Apr 22;101(1):19.
2
National and international services for primate animal research.国家和国际灵长类动物研究服务机构。
J Med Primatol. 1983;12(3):146-54.
3
Human health effects of hazardous chemical exposures.危险化学品暴露对人体健康的影响。
Conn Med. 1984 Jul;48(7):459-64.
4
5
ATSDR evaluation of health effects of benzene and relevance to public health.美国毒物与疾病登记署对苯健康影响的评估及其与公共卫生的相关性。
Toxicol Ind Health. 2008 Jun-Jul;24(5-6):263-398. doi: 10.1177/0748233708090910.
6
Animal biotechnology. Environmental impact seen as biggest risk.动物生物技术。环境影响被视为最大风险。
Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1257. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5585.1257a.
7
Human pesticide testing gets qualified OK.人体农药测试获得合格批准。
Environ Sci Technol. 2004 May 15;38(10):175A-176A. doi: 10.1021/es040491d.
8
Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk.环境卫生。再次审视砷发现风险更高。
Science. 2001 Sep 21;293(5538):2189. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5538.2189b.
9
Monitoring human tissues for toxic substances: a follow-up to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report.监测人体组织中的有毒物质：美国国家科学院（NAS）报告的后续跟进
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):81-4. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s381.
10
The BEIR III controversy.贝艾尔三世争议。
Radiat Res. 1980 Dec;84(3):361-8.
Zotero 插件