Porcellati F, Fanelli C, Bottini P, Epifano L, Rambotti A M, Lalli C, Pampanelli S, Scionti L, Santeusanio F, Brunetti P
Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy.
Diabetes. 1993 Jul;42(7):1055-64. doi: 10.2337/diab.42.7.1055.
To assess whether a therapeutic, subcutaneous injection of insulin exerts hemodynamic effects in subjects with IDDM, 0.2 U/kg regular insulin was injected subcutaneously in 17 IDDM subjects: 6 without autonomic neuropathy, 7 with autonomic neuropathy and othostatic hypotension, and 4 with autonomic neuropathy but without orthostatic hypotension. Plasma glucose was maintained at approximately 8.5 mM throughout the studies. Mean blood pressure, plasma norepinephrine concentration, forearm vascular resistances, and calf venous volume were measured before and 120 min after subcutaneous insulin, in the supine position and 5 min after standing. Supine plasma volume ([125I]albumin and [131I]albumin) was measured before and after subcutaneous injection of insulin. In all three groups, subcutaneous insulin activated the sympathetic nervous system (approximately 30% increase in norepinephrine concentration). In subjects with IDDM but without autonomic neuropathy, standing forearm vascular resistance increased approximately 70% less after subcutaneous insulin, but supine or standing mean blood pressure did not decrease. In contrast, in subjects with IDDM with autonomic neuropathy and orthostatic hypotension, subcutaneous insulin decreased supine mean blood pressure (from 99 +/- 3 to 94 +/- 5 mmHg) and exaggerated the standing decrement in mean blood pressure (24 +/- 3 vs. 19 +/- 2 mmHg) (P < 0.05). This was associated with a decrease in forearm vascular resistance. Similarly, in subjects with IDDM with autonomic neuropathy without orthostatic hypotension, subcutaneously injected insulin decreased supine mean blood pressure (from 95 +/- 2 to 89 +/- 2 mmHg) and standing mean blood pressure by 8 +/- 1 mmHg (P < 0.05). Calf venous volume was not affected by subcutaneous insulin in any of the three groups. Plasma volume did not change after subcutaneous insulin in subjects with IDDM without autonomic neuropathy, whereas it decreased in those with autonomic neuropathy and orthostatic hypotension from 1.692 +/- 0.069 to 1.610 +/- 0.064 L/m2, without orthostatic hypotension from 1.631 +/- 0.027 to 1.593 +/- 0.024 L/m2, P < 0.05). No hemodynamic effects were observed when subjects with IDDM were restudied in a control experiment where placebo (distilled water), not insulin, was injected subcutaneously. In conclusion, therapeutic doses of subcutaneous insulin activate the sympathetic nervous system; decrease blood pressure in subjects with IDDM with autonomic neuropathy, but not in those without, primarily by decreasing arterial vascular resistances and plasma volume; and have no effects of capacitance vessels. Thus, in subjects with IDDM without autonomic neuropathy, greater activation of sympathetic nervous system after subcutaneous injection of insulin prevents orthostatic hypotension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
为评估皮下注射治疗剂量的胰岛素是否会对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者产生血流动力学影响,对17例IDDM患者皮下注射了0.2U/kg的常规胰岛素:6例无自主神经病变,7例有自主神经病变并伴有体位性低血压,4例有自主神经病变但无体位性低血压。在整个研究过程中,血浆葡萄糖维持在约8.5 mM。在皮下注射胰岛素前及注射后120分钟,分别于仰卧位及站立5分钟后测量平均血压、血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度、前臂血管阻力和小腿静脉容量。在皮下注射胰岛素前后测量仰卧位血浆容量([125I]白蛋白和[131I]白蛋白)。在所有三组中,皮下注射胰岛素均激活了交感神经系统(去甲肾上腺素浓度增加约30%)。在无自主神经病变的IDDM患者中,皮下注射胰岛素后站立时前臂血管阻力增加约70%,但仰卧位或站立位平均血压未降低。相比之下,在有自主神经病变并伴有体位性低血压的IDDM患者中,皮下注射胰岛素使仰卧位平均血压降低(从99±3降至94±5 mmHg),并使站立时平均血压的下降幅度增大(24±3对19±2 mmHg)(P<0.05)。这与前臂血管阻力降低有关。同样,在有自主神经病变但无体位性低血压的IDDM患者中,皮下注射胰岛素使仰卧位平均血压降低(从95±2降至89±2 mmHg),站立位平均血压降低8±1 mmHg(P<0.05)。在三组中的任何一组中,皮下注射胰岛素均未影响小腿静脉容量。在无自主神经病变的IDDM患者中,皮下注射胰岛素后血浆容量未改变,而在有自主神经病变并伴有体位性低血压的患者中,血浆容量从1.692±0.069降至1.610±0.064 L/m2,在无体位性低血压的患者中,从1.631±0.027降至1.593±0.024 L/m2(P<0.05)。在对照实验中,对IDDM患者皮下注射安慰剂(蒸馏水)而非胰岛素时,未观察到血流动力学效应。总之,治疗剂量的皮下胰岛素激活交感神经系统;降低有自主神经病变的IDDM患者的血压,但对无自主神经病变的患者无此作用,主要是通过降低动脉血管阻力和血浆容量实现;对容量血管无影响。因此,在无自主神经病变的IDDM患者中,皮下注射胰岛素后交感神经系统的更大激活可预防体位性低血压。(摘要截断于400字)